Alexandria is trying to learn more about In re Gault, a United States Supreme Court decision that changed the way courts handled juvenile cases. Which was NOT an outcome of this ruling?
A.) Juveniles must be notified of the charges against them.
B.) Underage defendants must have access to an attorney.
C.) Underage defendants have the right to confront witnesses.
D.) Juvenile defendants must testify if they are called on.
D) Juvenile defendants must testify if they are called on, was not an outcome of In re Gault.
To determine which outcome was NOT a result of the In re Gault Supreme Court decision, Alexandria can research the case and its implications. In re Gault was a landmark ruling in 1967 that extended several constitutional rights to juvenile defendants. Alexandria can start by looking for reliable resources such as legal databases, law textbooks, or scholarly articles on the In re Gault case. These sources will provide a comprehensive understanding of the decision and its impact on juvenile justice proceedings.
By studying the case, Alexandria can identify the key issues addressed by the court and the specific rights that were granted to juvenile defendants. In this context, she can evaluate each option to determine which one does not align with the outcomes of the In re Gault ruling. Here is a brief overview of the outcomes in question:
A.) Juveniles must be notified of the charges against them: This was properly addressed in the In re Gault ruling, ensuring that juvenile defendants have the right to know the charges brought against them.
B.) Underage defendants must have access to an attorney: The In re Gault decision significantly revolutionized the juvenile justice system by granting underage defendants the right to an attorney, even if they could not afford one.
C.) Underage defendants have the right to confront witnesses: In re Gault also expanded the rights of juvenile defendants by giving them the opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses during the hearings.
D.) Juvenile defendants must testify if they are called on: This is the option to focus on for determining the correct answer. Alexandria can examine whether the In re Gault ruling addressed this particular aspect.
By analyzing the available information, Alexandria will be able to identify the outcome that was NOT a result of the In re Gault Supreme Court decision.