In which way was the practice of slavery damaging to the Roman Empire?
*
1 point
Slaves had to be fed and sheltered, which hurt the Roman economy.
Roman slavery made other nations see Rome as wicked.
It was difficult to determine who was a slave and who was free.
There were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens.
The practice of slavery was damaging to the Roman Empire because there were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens. The use of slave labor in agriculture, mining and manufacturing decreased job opportunities for poor and underprivileged Roman citizens leading to economic inequality, resentment and potential unrest.
so there were fewer jobs available?
In which way was the practice of slavery damaging to the Roman Empire?
*
1 point
Slaves had to be fed and sheltered, which hurt the Roman economy.
Roman slavery made other nations see Rome as wicked.
It was difficult to determine who was a slave and who was free.
There were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens.
Yes, there were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens.
How did the Roman Empire's use of roads help their economic growth?
*
1 point
The roads were owned by Rome's private businesses.
The Romans were paid well for building the roads.
The Romans rented their roads to other empires.
The roads made trading easier within the empire
The roads made trading easier within the empire, which helped the Roman Empire's economic growth.
The correct answer is: There were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens.
To determine the correct answer, let's evaluate each option:
1. Slaves had to be fed and sheltered, which hurt the Roman economy: While it is true that slaves had to be provided for, slavery was an integral part of the Roman economy. Slaves performed various tasks and labor, which actually contributed to the overall productivity and wealth of the empire. Therefore, this option is not the best answer.
2. Roman slavery made other nations see Rome as wicked: While the institution of slavery was certainly seen as morally reprehensible by some, it is unlikely that this perception alone significantly damaged the Roman Empire. This answer does not directly address the negative impact on the empire itself.
3. It was difficult to determine who was a slave and who was free: Although this may have caused some confusion and difficulties in certain cases, it does not directly address the negative effects on the empire as a whole.
4. There were fewer jobs available for free Roman citizens: This option directly addresses one of the key negative consequences of slavery in Rome. Slavery meant that a considerable portion of the labor force was made up of slaves, which reduced the number of available job opportunities for free Roman citizens. This reduction in employment for the free population could have had wide-ranging effects on the economy, social stability, and the overall welfare of Roman citizens.
Therefore, the most accurate answer is that slavery in Rome resulted in fewer job opportunities for free Roman citizens.