Agatha maintains that people are capable of freely making voluntary choices. Constance is mainly focused on how aggression is caused by genetic inheritance. It seems reasonable to assume that Constance is not much interested in environmental factors impacting behavior while Agatha rejecte
d the idea that genetics alone determine behavior.
This is an important distinction in the nature vs. nurture debate in psychology. Agatha's perspective is more aligned with the concept of free will, where individuals are seen as having control over their behavior and choices. This perspective emphasizes environmental factors, such as upbringing and life experiences, as shaping behavior.
On the other hand, Constance's perspective is more aligned with the idea of genetic determinism, where genes have a strong influence on behavior. This perspective emphasizes biological factors, such as genes and brain chemistry, as shaping behavior.
It's important to note that neither perspective is entirely correct or incorrect. The nature vs. nurture debate is complex and multifaceted, and both genetics and environment play a role in shaping behavior. It's important for researchers and psychologists to consider multiple factors when studying behavior and making assumptions about human nature.