The strategy of island hopping was a departure from orthodox naval strategy in that it

A.
relied heavily on submarine warfare.

B.
avoided landing soldiers for combat.

C.
left some enemy bases untouched.

D.
relied on new and advanced technology.

C. left some enemy bases untouched.

Oh, I've got one for you! The strategy of island hopping was like going on a vacation but with a twist. Instead of just lounging on one island, you hop from island to island like a frog playing a game of leapfrog. It was a departure from orthodox naval strategy because it avoided landing soldiers for combat, so they didn't have to engage in any intense beach volleyball matches. Instead, they left some enemy bases untouched like forgotten souvenirs in a gift shop. So, the answer is B.

The correct answer is B. The strategy of island hopping was a departure from orthodox naval strategy in that it avoided landing soldiers for combat.

The correct answer is B. The strategy of island hopping during World War II was a departure from orthodox naval strategy because it avoided landing soldiers for combat. To understand why this strategy was different, let's delve into some background information.

Island hopping was a military strategy employed by the United States during World War II in the Pacific theater against the Empire of Japan. The goal was to bypass heavily fortified Japanese-held islands and select only strategically important ones for capture. This strategy was seen as an alternative to the traditional approach of capturing every enemy-held island on the way to the ultimate objective.

Now, to determine why option B is the correct answer, we have to evaluate the other options:

Option A suggests that island hopping relied heavily on submarine warfare. While submarines were indeed an important component of the overall strategy, they were not the central focus. Island hopping relied on a combination of naval and amphibious forces, of which submarines played a supporting role.

Option C states that island hopping left some enemy bases untouched. This is true because not every Japanese-held island was considered strategically important. Instead of expending resources to capture every enemy base, island hopping involved targeting key islands (usually those with airfields or naval bases) that could be used as bases for further operations.

Option D states that island hopping relied on new and advanced technology. While technological advancements such as improved aircraft, amphibious assault vehicles, and naval equipment were utilized during island hopping, they were not central to the strategy itself.

Therefore, based on the explanations above, it is clear that option B, which states that island hopping avoided landing soldiers for combat, is the correct answer.