Which statement best describes the differences between architectural developments in Russian and Inca culture?
A.) Russian architecture used few expensive materials; Inca architecture used plenty of gold
B.) Russian architecture was built to withstand earthquakes; Inca architecture was weak
C.) Russian architecture extravagant, Inca architecture was elegantly simple.
D.) Russian architecture emphasized the rectangle; Inca architecture emphasized the sphere.
The correct answer is D.) Russian architecture emphasized the rectangle; Inca architecture emphasized the sphere.
To determine the correct answer, we need to compare the architectural developments in Russian and Inca culture.
A.) Russian architecture used few expensive materials; Inca architecture used plenty of gold: This option implies that Russian architecture used limited expensive materials, while Inca architecture was characterized by the abundant use of gold. However, this statement oversimplifies both cultures' architectural practices and materials used.
B.) Russian architecture was built to withstand earthquakes; Inca architecture was weak: This option suggests that Russian architecture was designed with earthquake resistance in mind, while Inca architecture was weak. While it's true that Russian architecture like onion domes and solid masonry construction techniques aimed to withstand seismic activity, claiming that Inca architecture was weak is not entirely accurate. Inca architecture, such as their stone walls, was renowned for its stability and durability.
C.) Russian architecture was extravagant, Inca architecture was elegantly simple: This statement proposes that Russian architecture tended to be extravagant, while Inca architecture was elegantly simple. This option touches upon the architectural styles of both cultures, with Russian architecture often displaying opulence and grandeur, while Inca architecture was characterized by its functional simplicity.
D.) Russian architecture emphasized the rectangle; Inca architecture emphasized the sphere: This option suggests that Russian architecture primarily featured rectangular shapes, while Inca architecture focused on the use of spherical shapes. While Russian architecture often utilizes rectangular forms, it is not accurate to say that Inca architecture emphasized the sphere; rather, Inca architecture frequently incorporated trapezoidal and polygonal shapes.
Based on these comparisons, the statement that best describes the differences between architectural developments in Russian and Inca culture is C.) Russian architecture was extravagant, Inca architecture was elegantly simple. However, it's important to note that architecture is a complex subject with various influences, and generalizations may not capture the entire range of diversity within each cultural context.