Excerpt from Angelina Emily Grimke’s Letter XII, October 2, 1837

The investigation of the rights of the slave has led me to a better understanding of my own. I have fought the Anti-Slavery cause to be the high school of morals in our land—the school in which human rights are more fully investigated, and better understood and taught, than in any other. . . . Human beings have rights, because they are moral beings: the rights of all men grow out of their moral nature; and as all men have the same moral nature, they have essentially the same rights. These rights may be wrested from the slave, but they cannot be alienated. . . . Now if rights are founded in the nature of our moral being, then the mere circumstances of sex does not give to man higher rights and responsibilities, than to women. . . . To suppose that it does, would be to break up utterly the relations, of the two natures . . . exalting the animal nature into a monarch, and humbling the moral into a slave.

Use the excerpt to answer the question.

This excerpt from Angelina Emily Grimke’s letter MOST CLEARLY shows the

A.
need for organization of the movement across states.

B.
alignment of women’s rights and abolitionism’s goals.

C.
challenge of having one’s voice heard in the public sphere.

D.
application of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience tactics.

PLEASE, ALSO EXPLAIN WHY ITS THE CORRECT ANSWER, DO NOT GUESS, USE THE EXPERT.

B. Alignment of women’s rights and abolitionism’s goals. This excerpt from Angelina Emily Grimke’s letter shows her argument that rights are founded in the nature of our moral being, and that the mere circumstances of sex does not give to man higher rights and responsibilities than to women. She argues that this would break up the relations of the two natures, exalting the animal nature into a monarch and humbling the moral into a slave. This shows her alignment of women’s rights and abolitionism’s goals, as she argues that both men and women have the same moral nature and thus the same rights.