What fundamental problem did Noah Webster see in the articles of confederation
Noah Webster, a prominent American lexicographer and political writer, identified several fundamental problems with the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States, adopted in 1781 and later replaced by the U.S. Constitution in 1789.
One of the critical issues that Webster observed with the Articles of Confederation was the weakness of the central government. Under the Articles, the national government had limited powers and lacked the authority to enforce its laws or regulate commerce effectively. This meant that the states had considerable autonomy and could often act in their self-interest, leading to conflicts and discord between them.
To understand Webster's perspective on this matter, you can consult primary sources such as his writings, letters, or speeches discussing the Articles of Confederation. These sources may shed light on his specific arguments and proposals for improving the weaknesses of the Articles.
In addition to analyzing Webster's viewpoints, it's also important to delve into the historical context surrounding the Articles of Confederation. This includes studying the debates and discussions that unfolded during the drafting and ratification process. Examining other historical figures' views, such as those expressed in the Federalist Papers, can provide further insights into the perceived problems of the Articles and the rationale behind their eventual replacement.
By immersing yourself in the primary and secondary sources related to Noah Webster and the Articles of Confederation, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental problems Webster saw in the Articles and how they influenced the development of the U.S. Constitution.