1. How did Manifest Destiny affect the lives of Native Americans and Hispanic communities already living in new U.S. territories?
A.
They could have their lands taken and be removed from the area.
B.
They could apply to the government for additional land and supplies.
C.
They could be forced to take in people who wanted to move to the area.
D.
They could help the government further expand U.S. territory in the area.
2. What reason did the Democratic-Republicans give for opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts?
A.
They were unconstitutional.
B.
They were too pro-French.
C.
They targeted wealthy elites.
D.
They opened the country to unlimited immigration.
1. To answer the first question, you need to understand the concept of Manifest Destiny and its impact on Native Americans and Hispanic communities in new U.S. territories.
Manifest Destiny was the belief that it was the God-given right and destiny of the United States to expand its territory from coast to coast. This expansionist ideology had a profound impact on the lives of Native Americans and Hispanic communities already living in these new territories.
The correct answer to the question is A. They could have their lands taken and be removed from the area.
Explanation: As the United States expanded westward, Native Americans and Hispanic communities often found themselves in conflict with the incoming settlers. They faced forced removal from their ancestral lands as the U.S. government sought to acquire more territory for settlement and economic development. This led to massive displacement, loss of cultural heritage, and in some cases, violent conflicts resulting in significant loss of life.
Options B, C, and D are not accurate in describing the effects of Manifest Destiny on Native Americans and Hispanic communities. While some individuals or groups may have sought government assistance or willingly accommodated newcomers, the overall impact on these communities was predominantly negative.
2. The second question pertains to the Democratic-Republicans' opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts. To understand their reasoning, you would need to know the context and purpose of these acts.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were a series of laws passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress in 1798. These acts gave the president expanded powers to deport immigrants deemed dangerous, extended the residency requirement for naturalization, and made it a crime to criticize the government or its officials.
The correct answer to the question is A. They were unconstitutional.
Explanation: The Democratic-Republicans, who opposed the Federalist Party, argued that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional because they violated the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and press. They believed that the acts were a direct attack on democratic principles and an infringement on individual liberties.
Options B, C, and D do not accurately reflect the Democratic-Republicans' main argument against the Alien and Sedition Acts. While the acts might have had indirect implications related to foreign relations, elite targeting, or immigration, the primary concern of the Democratic-Republicans centered around the violation of constitutional rights.