How does the cartoonist’s point of view affect the document as a reliable
source of evidence? (The cartoon is 1919: The Child Who Wanted To Play By Himself)
To evaluate how the cartoonist's point of view affects the reliability of the document as evidence, you need to consider a few factors. Here's how you can approach it:
1. Examine the cartoonist's intent: Start by understanding the cartoonist's purpose or message. Determine if they are trying to inform, persuade, criticize, or entertain. This will give you insight into their perspective and potential biases.
2. Analyze visual cues: Take a close look at the cartoon's visual elements such as symbols, characters, and settings. Consider how these visuals are presented and what they are meant to convey. Understand that the cartoonist might use exaggeration or symbolism to emphasize their viewpoint.
3. Research the cartoonist's background: Investigate the cartoonist’s background, political affiliations, and any potential biases they may have. Understanding their context can provide further insight into their point of view and potential motivations.
4. Consider the historical context: Place the cartoon in its historical context. Understand the events or issues occurring at the time the cartoon was created, as this can help decipher the cartoonist's perspective and the societal influences that might have shaped it.
5. Evaluate corroborating evidence: Look for additional evidence or accounts that support or contradict the cartoonist's viewpoint. Compare the cartoon's message with other primary and secondary sources to determine its reliability and validity.
By examining the cartoonist's intent, analyzing visual cues, researching their background, considering historical context, and evaluating corroborating evidence, you can better understand how the cartoonist's point of view might affect the document as a reliable source of evidence. This critical approach will help you form a more informed opinion about the reliability of the cartoon as historical evidence.