Is this good enough info for my school project?
i wrote this all by myself- and all my info i put into my own words...
directions- Analyze the media bias you see in the 1912 article about the Titanic. Discuss the possible reasons that led reporters to believe the White Star hype. Then consider how hype or propaganda may bias reporting today. Give examples if you can.
Everyone who were involved with creating the Titanic claimed it was unsinkable, witch was not true or false, no one knew because no one tested it- they just claimed it was unsinkable because it was made with two million steel, and that got almost everyone's eye. I think that the white star line is at fault. First of all there were not enough life boats for all the people on the Titanic. The ships crew didn't bother dealing with the six ice warnings that were severe and dangerous condition. They told people that the Titanic was not sinking, but it was sinking they wanted nothing to do with it. They didn't want to be responsible for all of those death's.
Plz let me know!
>3 Pākā
I think that's great info, awesome- love all the details i this!
sorry my heart didn't come through- well i love your summery!
well ... its more like i share what i learned then we start our own discussion and talk with our class mates but- thankssss youu!!! UwU
Based on the information you provided, it seems that you have discussed the media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic and the reasons that led reporters to believe in the hype created by the White Star Line. You have also mentioned how the lack of lifeboats, disregard for ice warnings, and denial of the sinking contributed to the tragedy.
To determine if your information is good enough for your school project, there are a few factors you can consider:
1. Relevance: Does your information directly address the topic of media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic and its connection to the White Star Line's hype? Make sure your analysis is focused and meaningful.
2. Depth of analysis: Did you provide sufficient analysis and explanation of the media bias and the reasons behind it? Consider whether you have thoroughly discussed and supported your points with evidence and examples.
3. Originality: Did you use your own words and thoughts to convey the information and analysis? Make sure to avoid plagiarism and properly reference any sources you may have used for research.
4. Completeness: Does your response cover all aspects of the prompt, including discussing how hype or propaganda may bias reporting today? Ensure that you have addressed all the required elements and provided relevant examples.
It's also essential to review your work for grammar, clarity, and coherence. If you believe that you have met these criteria and adequately addressed the prompt, then your information should be sufficient for your school project. However, it's always a good idea to seek feedback from your teacher or classmates to ensure that your work meets the project's requirements.