Is the Australian war with the emus human geography or physical geography?
To determine whether the Australian war with emus is human geography or physical geography, it's important to understand the definitions of these terms. Human geography is the study of humans and their activities, including their impact on the physical environment. It focuses on topics such as population, culture, urbanization, and political systems. On the other hand, physical geography involves studying the natural environment, including landforms, climate, ecosystems, and natural processes.
In the case of the Australian war with emus, it can be argued that it falls more under human geography. While emus are native to Australia and their presence can be considered an aspect of physical geography, the conflict itself was triggered by human intervention. In 1932, a large number of emus migrated into Western Australia, causing agricultural damage. As a response, the Australian government deployed soldiers with machine guns to control the emu population, resulting in what was dubbed the "Great Emu War."
This event showcases human-environment interaction, demonstrating how humans perceived the presence of emus as a threat to their agricultural activities and took military action in response. Therefore, the Australian war with emus is primarily a manifestation of human geography, specifically the intersection of human activities and the impact on the natural environment.