1) Which should a speaker use to support a claim?(1 point)
evidence
persuasion
opinions
call to action
2) How does relevant evidence support a speaker’s argument?(1 point)
It is related directly to the claim.
The information is interesting.
The opinions are stated clearly.
It captures the audience’s attention.
3) Which term describes the use of enough information to support a claim?(1 point)
relevant evidence
interesting evidence
sufficient evidence
important evidence
4) Which makes a speaker’s argument most convincing?(1 point)
using relevant and sufficient evidence
researching the topic thoroughly
including many opinions
providing a call to action
1) Which should a speaker use to support a claim?
Evidence
2) How does relevant evidence support a speaker’s argument?
It is related directly to the claim.
3) Which term describes the use of enough information to support a claim?
sufficient evidence
4) Which makes a speaker’s argument most convincing?
using relevant and sufficient evidence
The wonderful person above me is 100% CORRECT 4/4 100% GUARANTEED. <3
When I first found this I saw comments on here saying ("OmG wHy ArE yOu
HeRe ThAt'S cHeAtInG") I'm just sitting here like you basically came here just to debate about something
Thats the most terrific comment I've seen this week
For me I have a fifth question:
Which sentence correctly explains the difference between sufficient and relevant evidence?
Answer: Sufficient evidence is enough facts and details to prove or support a claim, whereas relevant evidence directly relates to the ideas in the claim.
Other than that, Anonymous is 100% correct!