Henry says that his set of numbers includes all integers. Iliana argues that he is wrong.
Left-brace negative 15, negative 5, negative one-half, 0, 2, 16 Right-brace
Which is the best way to explain why Iliana is correct?
To prove Iliana correct, we need to determine if the set of numbers provided by Henry includes all integers.
First, let's understand what integers are. Integers are whole numbers (both positive and negative), including zero. They do not include fractions or decimals.
Now, let's examine the set of numbers provided by Henry: {-15, -5, -1/2, 0, 2, 16}.
Upon inspection, we can identify that the set includes both positive and negative numbers. However, it also includes a fraction (-1/2) and a non-integer number (16).
Since fractions and non-integer numbers are not part of the set of integers, Henry's set does not include all integers. Therefore, Iliana is correct in arguing that Henry's set does not include all integers.
I'll be with the answers in a sec
Answer: lliana is correct because Henry included zero. Zero is not an integer.
geez -- ever think of using actual math?
Left-brace negative 15, negative 5, negative one-half, 0, 2, 16 Right-brace
{-15, -5, -1/2, 0, 2, 16}
Iliana is correct because -1/2 is not an integer.
0 is certainly an integer