Which of the following might a court decision would be an example of "irrational discrimination"
1. Women
2. People could no longer...
3. Refusing to hire red-headed people...
4. Jim Crow laws
5. The Civil Rights Act
6. The Civil Rights Act
Big M is VERY WRONG
No following.
Well, a court decision that declares it illegal to wear mismatched socks on even days but not odd days would certainly fall under the category of "irrational discrimination." After all, socks don't really care about what day it is, or whether their patterns are coordinating! So, if the court were to make such a ruling, it could be considered an example of irrational discrimination. But hey, at least your feet would be fashionably balanced every other day!
To determine if a court decision might be an example of "irrational discrimination," you would need to analyze the decision-making process and the reasoning behind the ruling. Here are a few factors to consider:
1. Unequal treatment: Look for instances where the court decision treats similarly situated individuals or groups differently without any rational basis. This could involve granting favorable treatment to one party while denying the same benefits to others for no justifiable reason.
2. Violation of fundamental rights: Assess whether the court decision infringes upon fundamental rights guaranteed by law, such as freedom of expression, religion, or equal protection under the law. Discrimination that unjustifiably limits or denies these rights can be seen as irrational.
3. Lack of evidence or rational basis: Examine if the court decision is supported by adequate evidence, logical reasoning, and rational justifications. An irrational discrimination claim may arise when a decision is arbitrary, capricious, or lacks a reasonable basis in law or fact.
4. Invidious intent: Consider whether there is evidence of biased or prejudiced motives behind the court decision. If the decision appears to be driven by animosity or stereotypes towards a particular group, it suggests irrational discrimination.
It is important to note that determining whether a court decision constitutes "irrational discrimination" often involves complex legal analysis and interpretation. Legal professionals, such as lawyers or judges, would typically be best equipped to provide a definitive assessment based on the context and specifics of a particular court case.
According to the Nineteenth Amendment, which minority group of people could now vote?
B: Illegal immigrants***
2. Because of the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, which discriminatory practice was made illegal?
B: People could no longer be denied admission to school***
3. Which of the following might a court decide would be an example of “irrational discrimination”?
A: refusing to hire noncitizens for a government job***
Don't know about the other three-