Which of the following is a reason why historic and may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source: I NED HALLLP PLS IVE BEEN STUCK ON THIS QUESTION FOREFER
No following or specific question.
What are your choices?
When evaluating sources, historians may consider opinions as well as facts for several reasons:
1. Perspective and Bias: Opinions provide insights into the author's perspective and potential biases. Understanding the point of view of the source can help historians contextualize the information presented and consider any potential biases that may influence the reported facts.
2. Interpretation: Opinions can shed light on how the author interprets the facts or events being discussed. Historians often analyze different interpretations to better understand historical events and determine their true significance.
3. Controversial or Unverifiable Claims: Sometimes, sources may include claims or information that cannot be directly verified with objective facts. In such cases, historians may consider opinions and reasoning to assess the reliability and credibility of the claims.
4. Richness and Complexity: Historical events are often complex, and facts alone may not capture the full picture. Opinions can provide additional context, explanations, and insights that contribute to a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
To answer the question, it is important to carefully read and analyze the given options. Look for the answer choice that mentions the value of opinions in providing perspectives, interpretation, addressing controversies, or capturing the complexity of historical events. Narrow down the options based on these criteria, and select the answer accordingly.