Which argument would a Federalist make to support ratification of the Constitution?
A. The Constitution will enable states to nullify laws that are harmful to citizens
B. A strong federal government will more stable than a loose confederation of states
C. A republican system of government will better represent large states
D. The Constitution will allow states to establish banks to stabilize the national economy
IS A
It's B.
The argument that a Federalist would make to support the ratification of the Constitution is:
B. A strong federal government will be more stable than a loose confederation of states.
To understand this argument and why a Federalist would support it, it's helpful to dive deeper into the history and context of the Federalist movement and the Constitutional Convention.
The Federalists were those who favored the ratification of the United States Constitution and advocated for the creation of a strong central government. They believed that a strong federal government was necessary to maintain national unity, protect individual liberties, and promote economic stability. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists were opposed to the Constitution because they feared the concentration of power in a centralized government and argued for the preservation of states' rights.
The Federalists argued that a strong central government was essential for effective governance and the protection of the emerging nation. They feared that a loose confederation of states, as was the case under the Articles of Confederation, would lead to a weak and ineffective government. Under the Articles, the federal government had limited powers and struggled to address key issues such as taxation, national defense, and trade regulation. This resulted in frequent disputes among the states and weakened the overall efficiency and stability of the nation.
By advocating for a strong federal government, Federalists sought to establish a system where the central government could better administer the country's affairs, establish and enforce laws, handle foreign relations, and collect taxes. They believed that this centralized authority would foster stability and unity among the states, providing a stronger and more coherent foundation for the new nation.
In summary, a Federalist would argue in favor of the ratification of the Constitution because they believed that a strong federal government would provide stability and efficiency compared to the loose confederation of states under the Articles of Confederation.