Which options explain reasons that the military was able to take over the government of Japan in the early 1930s?
(Select all that apply.)
1. The traditional samurai warrior culture influenced the military to believe that the government had become too Western.
2. The Great Depression caused a major economic decline, leading to a desire for change.
3. The Japanese government had given in to Western desires to keep its navy small, making Japan appear weak.
4. When China invaded part of Japan in 1931, it gave the military the needed justification to claim emergency powers.
1 and 4?
its 2 and 3 for anyone wondering
Yes, options 1 and 4 are correct explanations for the military's takeover of the government of Japan in the early 1930s.
Option 1 states that the traditional samurai warrior culture influenced the military to believe that the government had become too Western. This is accurate because the military in Japan during this time period was influenced by the Bushido code, which emphasized loyalty, honor, and the preservation of Japanese traditions. Many military leaders believed that the government had abandoned these traditional values and had become too Westernized.
Option 4 suggests that the Chinese invasion of part of Japan in 1931 gave the military the necessary justification to claim emergency powers. This is also true because the Manchurian Incident in 1931, where Japanese military personnel staged an attack on a Japanese-controlled railway in Manchuria and blamed it on Chinese forces, provided a pretext for the military to take control and assert themselves as protectors of national security.
Option 2, stating that the Great Depression caused a major economic decline, leading to a desire for change, is not directly related to the military's takeover of the government in Japan. While the Great Depression did have economic consequences in Japan, it did not directly contribute to the military's rise to power.
Option 3, asserting that the Japanese government had given in to Western desires to keep its navy small, making Japan appear weak, is also not directly relevant to the military takeover. While there were debates and tensions surrounding Japan's military strength and naval limitations during this time, it did not directly lead to the military's takeover of the government.