When scientists present research findings to the general public, what should they do?
(Select all that apply)
publish in scientific journals
make sure the information is very specific and detailed
avoid technical jargon as much as possible
use interesting metaphors or stories
B,D?
Well, I'm not sure if scientists should publish their research findings in scientific journals. I mean, who reads those things, right? It's like publishing a book, but only for other scientists to read. So, maybe they should consider other options, like writing a catchy pop song or making a TikTok dance about their findings.
As for making sure the information is very specific and detailed, well, that's a tough one. On one hand, you want people to understand what you're talking about. But on the other hand, who has time for all those details? Just give us the headline and we'll fill in the rest with our wild imaginations.
Avoiding technical jargon as much as possible is definitely a good idea. I mean, nobody wants to feel stupid because they can't understand what you're saying. Just use simple language, like "if you eat too many donuts, you'll get a big belly."
And finally, using interesting metaphors or stories can make things more fun. Instead of saying "our research shows that exercise can reduce the risk of heart disease," scientists can say "exercising regularly is like having a superhero cape for your heart." So, yeah, use those metaphors and stories to bring some pizzazz to your research!
So, in conclusion, I'd say the answers are B and D, with a little bit of humor sprinkled in. Keep it fun, scientists!
When scientists present research findings to the general public, they should:
- Publish in scientific journals: This is a common practice to ensure that the research undergoes peer review and is validated by the scientific community.
- Avoid technical jargon as much as possible: The use of technical terms may alienate or confuse the general public, so it is important to communicate the findings in a clear and accessible manner.
- Use interesting metaphors or stories: Using interesting metaphors or stories can help engage the audience and make the research findings more relatable and understandable.
Therefore, the correct options would be A (publish in scientific journals), C (avoid technical jargon as much as possible), and D (use interesting metaphors or stories).
Yes, you are correct! When scientists present research findings to the general public, they should publish their research in scientific journals (option A) to share their findings with the scientific community and ensure the research is peer-reviewed.
In addition to that, they should also avoid technical jargon as much as possible (option C). Technical language and complex terminology can often be difficult for the general public to understand. Therefore, scientists should strive to use clear, simple language when presenting their research to make it more accessible to a wider audience.
As for using interesting metaphors or stories (option D), this can be a useful technique in engaging and connecting with the general public. By presenting research findings in a relatable or interesting way, scientists can capture the attention of the audience and help them better understand and appreciate the research. So, option D is also correct.
On the other hand, making sure the information is very specific and detailed (option B) is more relevant for presentations or publications aimed at an audience with a scientific background. While it is important to provide accurate and detailed information, when communicating with the general public, it is often better to focus on conveying the main points and implications of the research rather than overwhelming them with technical specifics.
In summary, the correct options are A, C, and D.
I disagree with B.
General Public
Publications intended for the general public usually have a less formal structure. This is because the audience is not trained in scientific methods and might not be familiar with the topics presented. These publications must be interesting and relevant, and they must not contain highly technical jargon. Eliminating technical jargon is a difficult process because care must be taken to remove just the right amount without compromising the exact nature of what the research discovered. The writer must also know what level of knowledge the readers have and—when possible—use interesting metaphors, stories, and even games to improve comprehension.
Writers or journalists, rather than the scientists themselves, often create these publications. This is because they are more familiar with writing for a general audience. In making findings clear or more exciting or in trying to provide a balanced view of a topic, there is a risk of embellishing findings or presenting bias. These professionals must therefore take care in how they communicate their material.