Would history be changed had the 1960 presidential debates not been televised?

A) yes
B)No
C)possible
D)Is not been relevant.

I don't know. What do you think?

It's impossible to say for sure. Mr. Nixon was favored in polls before the debate was televised and Mr. Kennedy afterwards. Some analysts think Nixon looked pale and wan and sweaty on TV and that influenced voters. He did refuse makeup under the strong, hot TV lights. Most people, especially when it took very strong light for the cameras, did use makeup for TV in order to look "natural". Who can know for sure what influenced the outcome of the election?

Mr. Nixon was also ill on the night of the debate and paler and shakier than normal for him.

To determine whether history would be changed had the 1960 presidential debates not been televised, we can engage in a thought exercise.

1. Research the Significance of the 1960 Presidential Debates: Start by understanding the historical context of the 1960 presidential debates between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. These debates were the first to be televised, marking a significant shift in media influence on political campaigns.

2. Analyze the Impact of the Televised Debates: Explore the effects the televised debates had on the election and subsequent history. Consider factors such as Kennedy's appearance, charm, and poise, which contrasted with Nixon's perceived nervousness. Review electoral outcomes and public opinion polls to understand the potential influence of the debates on voter decisions.

3. Explore Alternative Scenarios: Imagine a scenario in which the debates were not televised. Consider how this would affect voter perception of the candidates. Would Nixon's experience and policy positions have had a greater impact without the visual element of the debates? Would traditional media outlets still have covered the debates extensively, altering the narrative and influence?

4. Consider Historical Contingencies: Recognize that history is complex and interconnected, with many variables shaping events. Small changes can have unforeseen long-term consequences, making it challenging to definitively predict alternate outcomes. However, by examining the available evidence and considering the significance of the televised debates, we can make an informed estimation.

Based on these considerations, there is a strong possibility that history would be changed had the 1960 presidential debates not been televised. The visual component of the debates played a significant role in shaping public opinion, with Kennedy's charisma potentially swaying voters in his favor. However, it is essential to recognize that alternative factors and contingencies could still have influenced the election and subsequent history, even without televised debates. Therefore, the most accurate answer to the question would be C) possible.