The advantage of selecting probation/parole officers on the basis of a written examination is that:


A. it produces the candidates who will be the best probation/parole officers.


B. it provides the hiring agency with the greatest amount of flexibility.


C. it reduces or prevents political favoritism.


D. the written examination is required under the "Appointment" system.

I think it's C, but not sure.

I agree with you. It's C.

To determine the advantage of selecting probation/parole officers on the basis of a written examination, let's analyze each answer choice:

A. it produces the candidates who will be the best probation/parole officers.
This option suggests that a written examination helps identify the best candidates for the job. While this could be a potential advantage, it is not necessarily guaranteed. The written examination may assess certain knowledge or skills relevant to the role, but it may not capture all the qualities required to be an effective probation/parole officer.

B. it provides the hiring agency with the greatest amount of flexibility.
This option implies that a written examination allows the hiring agency to have more flexibility in their selection process. However, this advantage is not explicitly related to the effectiveness of probation/parole officers or their qualifications.

C. it reduces or prevents political favoritism.
This option indicates that a written examination can help minimize political favoritism in the selection process. Political favoritism refers to the tendency to give preferential treatment or hire candidates based on personal connections rather than merit. By relying on a written examination, which is based on objective criteria, it becomes more difficult for personal biases or political influence to affect the hiring decisions. This advantage seems to be relevant to the selection process and the overall integrity of the hiring system.

D. the written examination is required under the "Appointment" system.
This option states that a written examination is mandated under the "Appointment" system. While it may be a requirement under a specific system or policy, it does not necessarily address the advantages associated with selecting probation/parole officers through a written examination.

Based on the analysis, option C appears to be the most appropriate answer. Selecting probation/parole officers through a written examination helps reduce or prevent political favoritism, ensuring that candidates are evaluated based on their qualifications and merit rather than personal connections or influence.