Posted by shruthi on Thursday, November 1, 2012 at 10:41am.
this is a stupid problem. Why confuse the issue by scrambling the operators? Now, if we were assigning the operators to some new method, such as
let / stand for "square first operand and add the second"
so that 3/4 = 9+4 = 13
then there might be a point to it. Just mixing up the symbols achieves no purpose.
I totally agree with Steve and thought the same when I posted this reply in 2011
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1313932601
Related Questions
maths - ) If * stands for /, /stands for -, +stands for * and stands for...
FRENCH- BANGS - Bangs really confuse me:( Could I get a few notes on them please...
maths - plz give full answer for this i am not geting If * stands for -, /stands...
maths - ) If * stands for -, /stands for +, +stands for *, then which of the ...
maths - 1) If * stands for -, /stands for +, +stands for *, then which of the ...
calculus - use &-e to prove the following lim x^2-9/x+3 = -6 x->-3 ...
college - 7) Which of the following is true? A. The product P in the marketing ...
English - 1. One maple and three elms (stand, stands) in the yard. stands
science - How many Mm2 would there be in 43.65 dm2 Mm stands for Mega meters and...
MARKETING - Which of the following is true? A. The product P in the marketing ...
For Further Reading