What point would probably be included in an argument against the transfer of the Louisiana Colony to Spain?
a) that the colony was not profitable for France
b) that the colonists were loyal Frenchmen
c) that the consists traded with the British and Native Americans
d) that the colonists needed more supplies
What do you think?
I disagree.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/maps/lapurchase/essay3.html
Ms. Sue is is A?
To identify the point that would likely be included in an argument against the transfer of the Louisiana Colony to Spain, let's consider the options provided:
a) That the colony was not profitable for France: To determine if this point is valid, one would need to analyze historical records and economic data to assess the financial status of the colony during that period.
b) That the colonists were loyal Frenchmen: Establishing the loyalty of the colonists requires looking into primary sources such as letters, diaries, or official documents to understand their sentiments towards France.
c) That the colonists traded with the British and Native Americans: To verify this point, one would need to study trade records, documents, or any evidence of economic transactions involving the British and Native Americans.
d) That the colonists needed more supplies: Identifying whether the colonists required additional supplies would necessitate examining primary sources, such as requests for supplies or reports of shortages.
Considering the options, the most plausible answer would be C) that the colonists traded with the British and Native Americans. This point suggests that allowing Spain to take control of the Louisiana Colony could disrupt existing trade relationships and potentially harm the economy of the colony.
To confirm this answer or gain a more comprehensive understanding, further research into historical documents, economic records, and the political climate of the time would be necessary.