Do you agree with my teacher???

The thing that is wrong is they say "Islamist" are terrorist ever since 9/11; and they are not the ones who took over the plane and crashed the twin towers. Also, there is no such thing as Islam terrorism could i say christian terrorism, no because it makes no sense if you really look into it. But, Islam is a religion that worships only one God.... and is that fair to include that. Islam means peace in Arabic. So, this means they were not Muslims or even considered close to a Muslim who took over the plane. They should say terrorist or something different But, not interfere with anyone's religion. :)

I think there's too much generalization going on in that paragraph! You can read about generalizations and other fallacies here:

http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/

I think it all depends on the wording used. The men who hijacked the planes on 9/11/01 considered themselves Muslims, and yet there are many Muslims all over the world who deplore what they did.

Throughout history, this "I'm right; you're wrong; let's attack" mentality has occurred in various places with various religions (or no religious connection at all). Consider these, which are directly connected with Christianity:

Crusades (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades )

The long, drawn-out IRA conflicts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army_(1922%E2%80%931969) )

Westboro Church (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church )

I am Christian ... and I deplore the actions of the people involved in these actions, past and present.

So the question is ... do you agree with your teacher or not? How will you explain yourself?

k, thx

As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide some information and explain various perspectives.

It is important to approach such discussions with an open mind and acknowledge that different people may have different opinions on this matter. Let's break down your teacher's statement and the points you raised:

1. Using the term "Islamist" as a synonym for terrorism: The term "Islamist" refers to individuals who support or advocate for political or social changes inspired by Islamic teachings. It is essential to distinguish between Islam as a religion and Islamism as a political ideology. While it is true that some terrorists falsely claim to act in the name of Islam, it is important to avoid generalizations and not associate all Muslims with terrorism.

2. Linking terrorism solely to Islam: It is incorrect and inaccurate to associate terrorism solely with Islam. Terrorism is a complex issue, and individuals and organizations from various ideological backgrounds have been responsible for acts of terror worldwide. It is crucial to separate the actions of a few extremists from the beliefs and practices of Muslims as a whole.

3. Islam as a religion of peace: Islam, like other major religions, promotes peace, justice, and compassion. It is essential to recognize that the actions of a few individuals or groups do not represent the beliefs and teachings of an entire religion. Muslims around the world adhere to a variety of interpretations and practices within Islam, and violence is not inherent to the religion itself.

4. Considering different terminologies: Debates exist around which terms to use when describing individuals or groups involved in acts of terror. It is important to use precise and accurate language to describe such actions without painting an entire religion or community with a broad brush. Some people advocate for terms like "terrorist" or "extremist" instead of religious labels, as it helps avoid stereotyping or stigmatizing any particular religious group.

In summary, it is a complex issue, and it is important to be mindful of the distinctions between religion and ideology, as well as to avoid generalizations or assumptions about any faith or its followers. Discussing this topic respectfully and seeking accurate information can help foster better understanding and dialogue.