The transformation of the office of UN secretary-general from “chief clerk” to “international peacemaker” proves that
a.
the Security Council is not as powerful as it was meant to be.
b.
the General Assembly may also become more active someday.
c.
the original charter was inadequate when tested against actual circumstances.
d.
humans are in control of institutions, not the reverse.
c. the original charter was inadequate when tested against actual circumstances.
To determine the answer, we need to analyze the transformation of the office of UN Secretary-General from "chief clerk" to "international peacemaker" and what it signifies.
The United Nations Secretary-General is the head of the United Nations and plays a crucial role in international diplomacy and peacekeeping efforts. Historically, the office of the Secretary-General held a more administrative and bureaucratic role, often seen as a "chief clerk" who managed the day-to-day operations of the organization.
However, over time, the role of the Secretary-General has evolved to become more involved in international peacemaking and conflict resolution efforts. This transformation signifies a shift in the expectations and responsibilities placed on the office of the UN Secretary-General.
Now let's analyze the options:
a. The transformation does not necessarily indicate that the Security Council is not as powerful as it was meant to be. The Security Council remains a central institution in the United Nations and holds significant authority in matters of international peace and security.
b. The transformation does not directly imply that the General Assembly may also become more active someday. The General Assembly has always played an active role as the main deliberative and policymaking body of the United Nations.
c. The fact that the original charter was inadequate when tested against actual circumstances is a possibility, as the Secretary-General's role has evolved beyond what was initially envisioned in the charter. However, this option does not fully capture the significance of the transformation.
d. The transformation of the office of UN Secretary-General from "chief clerk" to "international peacemaker" does indeed highlight that humans are in control of institutions, and that the expectations and demands placed on them can change over time. This option reflects the dynamic nature of international politics and the potential for growth and evolution in international institutions.
Therefore, the most appropriate answer based on the given options is:
d. Humans are in control of institutions, not the reverse.