This is a debate about the age of young offenders.I am saying that the age for young offenders should be 10 to 18, Iinstead of 12 to 17. Can someone give me some ideas?

I think it should 10 to 17 because there are some pretty young kids out there that can and would commit a minor to serious offense depending on their upbringing and home setting. At 18 your now by law considered an adult and now fully responsible for your actions. You should therefore be treated as one. However, now days kids about 14 and up depending on the judge and case are being sentenced as an adult. So does the law of age really matter if it's not always being implicated?

Just my opinion. Hope it gives you some ideas.

I think Taylor means "enforced" instead of "implicated."

Overall, I think Taylor's right.

Certainly! When participating in a debate about the age of young offenders, it's important to consider various perspectives and supporting points for your argument. Here are a few ideas you can use to support your claim that the age for young offenders should be 10 to 18 instead of 12 to 17:

1. Cognitive development: Highlight the fact that research shows significant cognitive growth occurs during the ages of 10 to 12, which indicates that individuals within this age range are capable of understanding the consequences of their actions. Expanding the age range to 10 allows for a more accurate reflection of the developmental stages of young offenders.

2. Rehabilitation opportunities: Emphasize that expanding the age range to 10 could lead to increased access to rehabilitation programs and interventions for young individuals who are displaying delinquent behavior. By focusing on rehabilitation at an earlier age, there is a higher chance of correcting behavior, reducing recidivism rates, and ultimately reintegrating these individuals into society successfully.

3. Consistency and clarity: Argue that extending the age for young offenders to 10 provides consistency and clarity within the justice system. Since the legal age for many other responsibilities (e.g., consent, liability) is typically set at 18, maintaining consistency across various aspects of the law creates a more coherent legal framework.

4. Protecting society: Discuss how including 10-year-olds in the young offenders' category acknowledges that some individuals at this age may exhibit criminal behavior that poses a risk to society. Ensuring that appropriate measures are in place for these individuals, such as diversion programs or limited sentencing options, can contribute to better community safety.

Remember to cite relevant research, statistics, or examples to strengthen your arguments. Additionally, listen carefully to counterarguments and be prepared to respond thoughtfully and respectfully during the debate process.