were anti-federalists mainly southern states, and federalists were northern?
did they compromise by federalists adding the bill of rights into the constitution, that way it could be ratified?
At the time of the Constitution, federalists and anti-federalists were not residents of any specific part of the country.
http://www.ushistory.org/us/16b.asp
Yes, the Bill of Rights was a compromise with the federalists.
http://library.thinkquest.org/11572/creation/framing/feds.html
Yes, you are correct in stating that the Anti-Federalists were mainly composed of individuals from the southern states, particularly agrarian regions. On the other hand, the Federalists had stronger support in the northern states, which were more industrialized and urban.
As for your second question, the Anti-Federalists and Federalists did indeed reach a compromise regarding the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists voiced concerns that the original Constitution lacked explicit protections for individual liberties. In response, the Federalists, led by James Madison, proposed the addition of a Bill of Rights to address these concerns.
After a series of debates and discussions, the Federalists agreed to support the addition of a Bill of Rights as amendments to the Constitution. This compromise convinced many Anti-Federalists to support the Constitution, as it guaranteed certain fundamental rights and limited the powers of the federal government. The Bill of Rights was subsequently ratified in 1791, securing individual rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms.
Yes, you are correct. During the time of the drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution (1787-1789), there were two main political factions: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were more prevalent in the Southern states, whereas the Federalists had a stronger presence in the Northern states.
The Anti-Federalists had concerns about the powers granted to the federal government under the Constitution, fearing that it could undermine state sovereignty and individual liberties. These concerns were heightened by the absence of a specific listing of individual rights in the original Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in a strong central government and argued that the Constitution provided adequate protection of individual liberties.
To address the Anti-Federalists' concerns and to secure the necessary support for ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists made a commitment to add a Bill of Rights as amendments to the Constitution soon after ratification. The Bill of Rights, which consists of the first ten amendments, guarantees specific rights and limits the powers of the federal government. The addition of the Bill of Rights played a crucial role in securing the ratification of the Constitution, as it reassured many Anti-Federalists that their concerns over individual liberties would be addressed.
Overall, the compromise between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists resulted in the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, which helped to balance the powers of the federal government and protect individual rights.