Prompt:

Many communities are considering adopting curfews for high school students. Some educators and parents favor curfews because they believe it will encourage students to focus more on their homework and make them more responsible. Others feel curfews are up to families, not the community, and that students today need freedom to work and participate in social activities in order to mature properly. Do you think that communities should impose curfews on high school students?

Essay

High school students are known for their "out of control behavior". Communities are considering to adopt curfews for high school students. On the contrary, others think that it is up to the family and that not having curfews can possibly be a good thing. Although it is important to restrict high school students, the communities should leave it up to the family. Hence, communities should not impose curfews on high school students.

Educators and parents encourage curfews because they believe that students will tend to be more focused on their schoolwork and be more responsible. This may be true, but it is more important to consider other factors like freedom and social activities. Communities may set a curfew that at 5:00 pm students must be focusing on homework. This act of control can make the students more tenacious. It is difficult to instruct some teenagers to conform with the curfew. Most of the teenagers I know and I myself are very likely to do the contrary when curfews are set. In addition, curfews set by communities are not easily to be changed. Also, curfews limit the students' time, which is needed for community service. Thus, communities should not impose curfews on high school students

Students need freedom, so curfew should not be applied at all times. They need freedom to do productive things such as volunteer work. Curfews would limit their time to help the community. If the students take the advantage of their freedom prudently then they should not have curfew. In contrast, if the students use their time to hang out with friends, play games, and watch television for a long time then it is up to the family to deal with that. It is more flexible when the family set curfews rather than the community because when the students need to focus then curfew is needed but when they are focus and use their time wisely curfew is not needed. Most students are different from each other so it works best for the family to adjust the curfews.

As high school students they need to develop social skills. Hence, there should be no curfews, which can deprive them from social activities like outside school clubs. For example, if the students were to be home at six and the club meeting is at seven, then it may be impossible for them to participate in such activity. Students need to be exposed to the outside world in order to strengthen their communication skills. Also, they can develop problem-solving skills. For instance, if a student were to watch a kid who later got lost, the student must not be panic but instead try to solve the problem. These skills will greatly help the students to develop maturely. Curfew can shield students from acquiring these skill and so it should not be imposed by communities.

Communities must not establish curfews for high schools students but rather their family. Students need the freedom to develop good social skills. This freedom allows them to grow maturely.

Why are you always taking only one side or another on these questions? Why can't you write a paper in which you state that you don't believe curfews are a good idea in general, but there may be times when they must be set in place.

Stretch your thinking. Whenever you take an all-one-side or all-the-other-side position, you end up using fallacies. It's not a sign of good thinking.

http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/

Read these and start working on including these strategies in your writing:

http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/act-preparation/1137654-act-essay-guide-how-get-12-a.html

http://tutorsfortestprep.com/2009/perfect-act-essay/

I agree with writeteacher. An essay such as this will not reflect well on your thinking or writing ability.

Your introductions stinks.
Your logic stinks.
You generalize everything, without justification. You continually offer opinions, without groundwork (not everyone agrees with your opinions).
Examples:
1. >>Educators and parents encourage curfews because they believe that students will tend to be more focused on their schoolwork and be more responsible.>> Is it possible teens need 8_hours of sleep to function?

2.<<but it is more important to consider other factors like freedom and social activities. >> Really? No kidding?

3.<<Most of the teenagers I know and I myself are very likely to do the contrary when curfews are set.>> Hmmmm. You need new parents quickly.

4. <<Also, they can develop problem-solving skills. For instance, if a student were to watch a kid who later got lost, the student must not be panic but instead try to solve the problem.>> Hmmm. You just made a great argument against teens having "freedom"...to lose a kid, and not call in the police or an adult.

Reread Writeteachers comments. You can do better than this. I have rated many, many college essays, and I can assure you, they are looking for your ability to analyze concisely, and clearly state an argument, with a succinct closing and opening.

This would be rated 2.

Bob Pursley

Well, well, well, it seems like communities are thinking about imposing curfews on high school students. Personally, I think they should leave it up to the families. After all, families know their kids better than anyone else. Although it's important to keep those wild high schoolers in check, trying to control their every move with a curfew might just backfire. Trust me, I've seen it happen.

Now, some folks believe that curfews will make students more focused on their homework and responsible. Sure, that might be true for some nerdy overachievers, but for the rest of us? Not so much. I mean, have you ever tried telling a teenager what to do? It's like trying to herd cats. Next thing you know, they're sneaking out of windows and running wild in the streets. It's like a scene from a bad teen movie. So, imposing a curfew might not be the best idea if you don't want a circus in your community.

But let's not forget about freedom and social activities. Students need a little bit of independence to spread their wings and explore the world. And no, I don't mean exploring the latest viral TikTok dances. I'm talking about getting involved in clubs and extracurricular activities. How are they supposed to join the debate team or save the world through volunteer work if they have to be home by 5:00 pm? Let's give these kids a chance to socialize and develop important life skills, like how to navigate the awkwardness of a middle school dance.

Now, I'm not saying that parents should just let their kids run wild with no rules whatsoever. That's a recipe for disaster. But maybe, just maybe, it's better if families take charge of setting curfews. They know their kids best and can adjust the rules accordingly. Some students might need a curfew to keep them focused, while others might be responsible enough to handle a little more freedom. It's all about finding that sweet spot between structure and independence, like a unicorn balancing on a tightrope.

So, in conclusion, let's leave the curfew business to the families. They know what's best for their kids. Communities can focus on more important things, like building a giant statue of a rubber duck or hosting an annual silly hat parade. After all, life's too short to be cooped up indoors all the time. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a date with a pie-eating contest. Gotta practice my clown skills, you know?

To answer the question "Do you think that communities should impose curfews on high school students?" it is important to consider the arguments presented in the essay. The essay argues that communities should not impose curfews on high school students for several reasons.

First, the essay suggests that while curfews may encourage students to focus on their schoolwork and be more responsible, it is more important to consider other factors such as freedom and social activities. The essay explains that setting a curfew can make it difficult for teenagers to conform, as they may be more likely to rebel against the imposed curfew. Additionally, curfews restrict students' time, which is needed for community service. Therefore, the essay argues that communities should not impose curfews in order to give students the freedom to use their time wisely.

Second, the essay emphasizes the importance of freedom for high school students. It suggests that if students use their freedom wisely, they should not have a curfew. However, if they misuse their freedom, it becomes the responsibility of their families to address that issue. The essay argues that family-set curfews are more flexible because they can be adjusted to the individual needs and behavior of each student.

Lastly, the essay highlights the importance of social activities for high school students. It argues that curfews can deprive students of participating in extracurricular activities such as outside school clubs if the curfew conflicts with the timing of those activities. These social activities help students develop communication and problem-solving skills, which are crucial for their maturity. Therefore, curfews imposed by communities can hinder students' development in these areas.

In conclusion, the essay argues that communities should not impose curfews on high school students. Instead, it suggests that curfews should be set by families, as they are more flexible and can consider the individual needs of students. It also emphasizes the importance of freedom and social activities for students' growth and development. To decide whether communities should impose curfews on high school students, individuals should consider these factors and analyze the specific needs of their community.