in conducting experiments to test scientific theories,exceptions?

a.can be triggered if they are few in number
b.tend to be disproved or substantially weaken the theory and must be reported
c.are included to increase the power of the theory
d.suggest that the research method was faulty

my answer is c

Exceptions contradict the theory and must be reported.

so the aswer is b

do you think you could help me out with this question writeacher

i found in the text experiments are carried out to ensure that their predictions about children happen again and again.exceptions to this are not rejected but included to increase the power of theory

so I believe the right answer is c

To determine which option is correct, let's analyze each option:

a. Exceptions can be triggered if they are few in number.
This statement implies that exceptions can be artificially created if they are rare. However, in conducting experiments to test scientific theories, exceptions should arise naturally rather than be artificially induced. Therefore, this option is not the correct answer.

b. Exceptions tend to be disproved or substantially weaken the theory and must be reported.
Scientific theories are based on empirical evidence and are subject to testing. If exceptions consistently disprove or significantly weaken a theory, it suggests that the theory may require revision or may not accurately explain the phenomenon in question. Reporting such exceptions is essential for scientific progress and the advancement of knowledge. This option aligns with the scientific method and is therefore the correct answer.

c. Exceptions are included to increase the power of the theory.
Including exceptions to increase the power of a theory is not a common practice in science. A strong theory should be able to explain and predict observations within its domain of applicability. Exceptions may challenge or undermine a theory's predictive or explanatory power rather than strengthen it. Thus, this option is not the correct answer.

d. Exceptions suggest that the research method was faulty.
While exceptions can sometimes highlight problems with the research method or experimental design, they do not always indicate a faulty process. Exceptions can also signify opportunities for new discoveries or further investigation. It would be incorrect to assume that exceptions always suggest a faulty research method. Therefore, this option is not the correct answer.

Based on the analysis above, the correct answer is b. Exceptions tend to be disproved or substantially weaken the theory and must be reported.