i', so confuse because the only answer that i have let is Dennis v. U.S. Would that be the answer?

I'm the answer to Dennis v. U.S....which upheld the Smith Act, allowing the government to arrest members of the Communist Party based on the idea of a clear and probable danger.

No.

So you do have choices. <g>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_v._United_States

yes, i do have a choice on this one

these are the choices..
Bethel v. Fraser
Roe v. Wade
Dennis v. U.S
Texas v. Johnson
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Westside v. Mergens
Wallace v. Jaffree

I don't understand it either. It looks as though the answer should be one of the cases cited in this article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_v._United_States#Aftermath

Dennis v. U.S. is a landmark Supreme Court case that indeed pertains to the Smith Act and addresses issues related to the arrest and prosecution of members of the Communist Party. However, it is not clear from your question what specific information you are seeking or what context you are referring to.

If you are looking for more information about the case and its significance, I can provide that for you. The case of Dennis v. U.S. occurred in 1951 and involved eleven leaders of the Communist Party who were arrested and convicted under the Smith Act, which made it illegal to advocate the overthrow of the U.S. government by force or violence. The defendants argued that the Smith Act violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly.

The Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, upheld the convictions and ruled that advocacy of violent overthrow was not protected speech under the First Amendment when it posed a "clear and probable danger" to the government. This decision established the "clear and probable danger" test as the standard for evaluating restrictions on speech and became an influential precedent for subsequent cases involving free speech and national security.

If you have a specific question related to Dennis v. U.S. or the Smith Act, please provide more details so that I can provide a more accurate and informative explanation.