This is what the paper is about.
Choose a recent (within the last 2 years) article written for parents, teachers, or other family members on how to optimize the development of children (any age between conception through adolescence may be used) or written for family members on how to improve family functioning. This article is casual, one that would be read by non-child development people. Evaluate this casual article by comparing it with professional research that pertain to the topic of the article, using professional journals, edited books, research monographs and/or government publications. The main requirement is that the sources report original research or theory by the authors (i.e., that primary sources of theory and research be used for the evaluation). Cite sources in the body of the paper and provide a list of reference cited at the end of the paper using APA style.
I have to find a casual article and compare and contrast its information with scientific information using scholarly sources. For the first part he wanted us to talk about how we located the article and what advice we would give to the parents. This is what he wants for the second part of the essay.
2) What credibility did you give initially to an article drawn from the W_W_W? What are your thoughts about the practical experience versus scientific information as credible sources of information about children or families (as applied to the article)? Why?
Resilience during childhood is one of the most important qualities a person can have, because it helps with difficult life experiences, such as lonely times, frustrating times, and unfair times. For this reason it is vital for parents to help build their child’s backbone in order for them to bounce back through hardships. The search engine called, google was used to find a web article on this topic. The advice I would give to parents who are interested in this topic is to find a computer with internet access and summarize their topic into general keywords. Then, I would recommend they use google as their search engine. Once they enter the keywords on the search engine site a list of websites will appear and they can decide which websites answer their questions best.
I'm not sure if I answered his questions for the second part fully and correctly? I'll appreciate your feedback on that as well. Thanks! :)
邮件营销平台哪个好你知道?名气很大。有名的东西自有他的道理。你想知道,出类拔萃,并非偶然。
点击量
To answer the questions in the second part of your essay, you will need to discuss your initial credibility assessment of the article and provide your thoughts on the credibility of practical experience versus scientific information as sources of information about children or families.
1) Initial credibility assessment of the article:
To evaluate the credibility of the article, you will need to consider the source from where you obtained it. In this case, you mentioned that you found the article on the World Wide Web (WWW). It is important to critically assess online sources and consider factors such as the author's credentials, the publication or website hosting the article, and the presence of bias or objective reporting.
To determine the credibility of the article, you could examine the qualifications and expertise of the author. Look for information about their background, education, and experience in child development or family studies. This information can help you assess whether the author possesses the necessary expertise to provide reliable information on the topic.
Additionally, you can evaluate the credibility of the publication or website hosting the article. Research the reputation and reliability of the source to ensure it is reputable, well-established, and known for providing accurate and evidence-based information.
2) Thoughts on practical experience versus scientific information as credible sources:
When discussing the credibility of practical experience versus scientific information as sources of information about children or families, it is important to consider the strengths and limitations of each.
Practical experience refers to firsthand knowledge gained through personal involvement with children or families. It can come from parents, teachers, or other individuals who have directly interacted with children or have personal experiences related to family functioning. While practical experience can provide valuable insights and anecdotal evidence, it is subjective and may be limited to individual cases. Practical experience is often influenced by personal biases and may not have been systematically studied or subjected to rigorous scientific analysis.
On the other hand, scientific information refers to research studies conducted using rigorous methodologies and published in scholarly journals or other reputable sources. Such information is based on empirical evidence collected through controlled studies, experiments, or surveys. Scientific research undergoes peer review, where experts in the field critically evaluate and validate the study's methodology and findings. This process helps ensure that scientific information is objective, reliable, and generalizable.
When comparing practical experience and scientific information, it is essential to recognize that both have their strengths and limitations. Practical experience can provide real-life insights and context-specific knowledge, while scientific information offers a more systematic approach, generalizability, and credibility due to rigorous research methods.
In conclusion, your thoughts on the credibility of an article from the WWW should be based on a critical assessment of the source, the author, and the presence of bias. Regarding practical experience versus scientific information, both can contribute valuable perspectives, but scientific research is generally considered more credible and reliable due to its objective and rigorous nature. However, it is important to acknowledge that a combination of both practical experience and scientific information can provide a comprehensive understanding of children or family-related topics.