She must either steal and feed her children or not steal and let them go hungry. Provide your reasons that justify either one of these positions. Citique the arguments offered by your classmates.

Neither choice is justified. Other options are available.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Ashford-University-Asks-Employees-to-Resign-211927851.html

Read the following instructions in order to complete this assignment and review the example of how to complete the math required for this assignment:

Use the properties of real numbers to simplify the following expressions:

2a(a – 5) + 4(a – 5)

2w – 3 + 3(w – 4) – 5(w – 6)

0.05(0.3m + 35n) – 0.8(-0.09n – 22m)

Write a two- to three-page paper that is formatted in APA style and according to the Math Writing Guide. Format your math work as shown in the Instructor Guidance and be concise in your reasoning. In the body of your essay, do the following:

Demonstrate your solution to the above problems, making sure to include all mathematical work. Show every step of the process of simplifying and identify which property of real numbers was used in each step of your work. Please include your math work on the left and the properties used on the right.

Explain why the properties of real numbers are important to know when working with algebra. In what ways are they useful for simplifying algebraic expressions?

Incorporate the following five math vocabulary words into the text of your paper. Use bold font to emphasize the words in your writing (Do not write definitions for the words; use them appropriately in sentences describing your math work):

Simplify

Like terms

Coefficient

Distributive

Removing parentheses
For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

The scenario presented involves a moral dilemma, where a person is forced to choose between stealing to feed their children or not stealing and letting them go hungry. Both options have ethical considerations, and different arguments can be made to justify each position.

Argument for Stealing to Feed Children:
1. The primary duty is to ensure the well-being and survival of one's children. In this situation, stealing becomes a means for fulfilling that duty. By stealing food, the parent is prioritizing the immediate needs of their children and ensuring their health and nourishment.

Critique:
- Some might argue that stealing is inherently morally wrong and that there are other means available to address the problem. They could suggest seeking assistance from social services, charitable organizations, or exploring legal alternatives to obtain food. They might see stealing as a violation of others’ rights or a breach of societal norms that should be condemned.

Argument for Not Stealing and Letting Children Go Hungry:
1. Stealing is morally wrong. It violates the principles of private property and respect for others' possessions.
2. By not stealing, we uphold the value of personal integrity and demonstrate the importance of honesty.
3. Seeking alternative solutions, such as seeking assistance from social services or showing resourcefulness can be seen as more ethical approaches to addressing the problem.

Critique:
- Critics of this position might argue that prioritizing abstract and societal moral values over the well-being of children is unreasonable. They may counter that not stealing could lead to harm for the children in the short term, and thus, this choice may seem morally negligent.

In any ethical dilemma, it is important to consider different perspectives, and arguments, as individuals may differ in their beliefs and judgments about what actions are morally right or wrong.