Identify two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media.
http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/
Read, read, read ... and take your pick!!
Two distinct fallacies that are commonly committed in the media are the appeal to emotion fallacy and the ad hominem fallacy.
1. Appeal to Emotion: This fallacy occurs when an argument is based on manipulating emotions rather than providing logical reasoning or evidence. In the media, it is often used to sway public opinion by exploiting emotions like fear, anger, or pity. Examples include using emotionally charged language, sensationalizing news stories, or relying heavily on personal anecdotes rather than facts and data.
To identify this fallacy, you can look for language or rhetoric that attempts to provoke an emotional response rather than presenting objective evidence or logical reasoning. Be skeptical of claims that solely rely on emotional appeals without substantial supporting evidence or logical arguments.
2. Ad Hominem: This fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. In the media, it is often used to discredit individuals or institutions by focusing on their personal traits, background, or character rather than engaging with the substantive arguments they are making. Ad hominem attacks can distract from the actual issue and undermine the credibility of the person or organization being attacked.
To spot ad hominem fallacies, pay attention to the arguments being made and whether they are attacked based on personal traits rather than being critically examined on their own merits. Be wary of arguments that resort to name-calling, personal insults, or attempts to undermine someone's credibility without addressing the substance of their argument.
By actively being aware of these fallacies, you can better evaluate the information presented in the media and make more informed judgments based on logical reasoning and evidence.