In contrast to the Warren Court, the Burger Court appeared to support a/an:
A. due process model.
B. crime control model.
C. corrections model.
D. inmates model.
is it B
2. Natural law is best described as:
A. the laws of the church.
B. a body of principles and rules that are considered to be uniquely fitting for and binding on any community of rational beings.
C. that set of standards and ideals established and imposed on individuals by community consensus.
D. subordinate to man-made law.
is it B
For the first question regarding the contrast between the Warren Court and the Burger Court, you have identified option B, the crime control model. To explain how you could arrive at this answer, let's break down the question:
The Warren Court refers to the period when Earl Warren served as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1953 to 1969. This court was known for its focus on expanding and protecting individual rights.
The Burger Court, on the other hand, refers to the period when Warren E. Burger served as Chief Justice from 1969 to 1986. This court had a different ideological makeup and often addressed issues related to crime and criminal justice.
To determine which model the Burger Court appeared to support, you can analyze the key principles of the options provided:
A. Due process model: This model emphasizes protecting the rights of individuals and ensuring fair treatment within the criminal justice system.
B. Crime control model: This model places a higher priority on the prevention of crime and maintaining public order, often at the expense of individual rights.
C. Corrections model: This model focuses on the management and operations of correctional institutions and the treatment of offenders.
D. Inmates model: This option is not generally recognized as a mainstream model in criminal justice discourse.
Given the context provided and the focus of the Burger Court, option B, the crime control model, is a reasonable choice. However, it is important to note that this answer may still require further analysis and evidence from specific cases or decisions made by the Burger Court to fully support the conclusion.
Moving on to the second question, you have correctly identified option B, a body of principles and rules that are considered to be uniquely fitting for and binding on any community of rational beings, as the best description of natural law. Here's an explanation:
Natural law refers to a theory of law that is based on universal principles and inherent norms rather than being created or imposed by human beings. It holds that certain ethical and moral principles are inherent in nature and are accessible to human reason. These principles are considered universally applicable and valid for all societies and individuals.
Option B aligns with this understanding by emphasizing that natural law consists of principles and rules that are fitting and binding on any community of rational beings. It recognizes the universal nature of natural law and its applicability to rational individuals.
Options A, C, and D are incorrect because they do not capture the essence of natural law as a concept that transcends religious laws, community consensus, or subordination to man-made laws.
In summary, you have correctly identified option B for the second question, which defines natural law as a body of principles and rules uniquely fitting and binding on any community of rational beings.