# Philosophy - HELP

How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid?

1. TvH
2. T→G
3. ~H ֶG

1. ~~A
2. ~A v C ֶC

1. S • T
2. (S • T) → G
3. G →(H v B) ֶ H v B

1. A →B
2. C →D
3. A v C
4. ~D ֶ B

1. 👍 0
2. 👎 0
3. 👁 74

## Similar Questions

1. ### Philosophy

How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid? 1. TvH 2. T→G 3. ~H ֶG 1. ~~A 2. ~A v C ֶC 1. S • T 2. (S • T) → G 3. G →(H v B) ֶ H v B 1. A →B 2. C →D 3. A v C 4. ~D ֶ B

asked by Ann on March 30, 2008
2. ### crt

Fill in the blanks where called for, and answer true or false where appropriate. 1. Valid arguments are said to be strong or weak. 2. Valid arguments are always good arguments. 3. Sound arguments are ________ arguments whose

asked by Me on March 15, 2009
3. ### Philosophy

a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using

asked by Anne on December 13, 2006
4. ### crt 205

I need to identify two arguments and define the premises and conclusion. I have to tell weather it is deductivly valid or inductivlely strong or in valid or weak and why. In the appendix 1 article Controlling Irrational Fears

asked by Lily on November 22, 2009
5. ### math for liberal arts

construct a truth table to determine whether each argument is valid. Be sure to state whether it is valid or invalid with each question. 1) ~p v q p ____ triangle of dots p^~q

asked by Sara on November 30, 2013
6. ### CRT 205

your response to the following: Of the two arguments provided in the digital story, which is valid and which is sound? When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more important to

asked by Anonymous on October 3, 2009
7. ### crt 205 critical thinking

Post your response to the following: Of the two arguments provided in the digital story, which is valid and which is sound? When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more

asked by Davisha on February 3, 2009
8. ### Law

what is the appropriate level of proof for showing a valid Miranda waiver? Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, Probable cause, Preponderance of evidence, Clear and convincing evidence

asked by Hai on May 6, 2017
9. ### English II

Roosevelt is arguing that journalists must only attack misconduct when they have valid proof. They must not dig just for the sake of digging; it is offensive to good Americans. Which statement most effectively argues against this

asked by Jessie on March 1, 2016
10. ### English

Roosevelt is arguing that journalists must only attack misconduct when they have valid proof. They must not dig just for the sake of digging; it is offensive to good Americans. Which statement most effectively argues against this

asked by sarah on March 8, 2016

More Similar Questions