When Nelson Mandela received the Nobel Peace Prize, he gave a speech in which he noted the contributions of Martin Luther King Jr. Here are some words of his speech:

"...It will not be presumptuous of us if we also add, among our predecessors, the name of another outstanding Nobel Peace Prize winner, the late African-American statesman and internationalist, the Rev Martin Luther King Jr. He, too, grappled with and died in the effort to make a contribution to the just solution of the same great issues of the day which we had to face as South Africans. We speak here of the challenge of the dichotomies of war and peace, violence and non-violence, racism and human dignity, oppression and repression and liberty and human rights, poverty and freedom from want."

Nelson MAndela seems to have changed his viewpoint the way to achieve change. He went from someone who supported violence to achieve change to someone that, like Martin Luther King Jr, believe in Non violence

IF Nelson Mandela had not spend 27 years in prison would he have felt the same way?
No because if he didn't stay in prison for 27 years he would have just been living as a person who supported violence

3.Why do people listen to Nelson even though he was put in prison for crimes like sabotage against the government?
Because he changed his viewpoint and instead supported non violence and he wasn't mad at the government for being put in jail for 27 years

IF Nelson Mandela had not spend 27 years in prison would he have felt the same way?

No because if he didn't stay in prison for 27 years he would have just been living as a person who supported violence

This is not a good question. Would he have been different if he'd spent 10 or 15 or 20 years in prison?

3. The people listened to Mandela because they believed as he did. Apartheid was wrong, wrong, wrong! They followed him because they wanted to rid the country of such horrible conditions -- no matter what the cost!

To find the answers, we can analyze the information given and make logical deductions based on historical context.

1. IF Nelson Mandela had not spent 27 years in prison, would he have felt the same way?
To answer this question, we can gather that Nelson Mandela's viewpoint underwent a transformation during his time in prison. It can be inferred that the harsh conditions and isolation he experienced during those years allowed him to reflect on his previous beliefs and led to a change in his approach to achieving change. Therefore, if he had not been imprisoned, it is possible that his viewpoint may not have shifted towards non-violence and peaceful means of conflict resolution.

2. Why do people listen to Nelson Mandela, even though he was put in prison for crimes like sabotage against the government?
Nelson Mandela's time in prison, particularly his lengthy sentence of 27 years, became a powerful symbol for his fight against apartheid in South Africa. His imprisonment turned him into a symbol of resistance and a champion for human rights and equality. Additionally, during his imprisonment, he earned respect and admiration for his resilience, activism, and commitment to his cause. Once released, Mandela's transformation from a perceived "enemy of the state" to a vocal advocate for peace and reconciliation demonstrated his ability to forgive and work towards a better future. This made him an influential figure, and people were drawn to his message of unity and non-violence.

It is important to note that Mandela's imprisonment was part of the historical context of South Africa's struggle against apartheid. Many people recognized the unjust nature of the apartheid regime and viewed Mandela's actions within that context, leading to a more sympathetic understanding of his choices and support for his advocacy after his release.

In conclusion, Nelson Mandela's time in prison played a significant role in shaping his beliefs and his subsequent impact on society. His transformation, subsequent advocacy for non-violence, and commitment to justice and equality contributed to people's willingness to listen to him, despite his past actions.