In the article "Conditioned emotional reactions" by John B. Watson and Rosalie Raynor., Explain the initial pairing of the bar and the rat in terms of learning through classical conditioning

What are unconditional stimulus (US) conditional stimulus (CS) and conditional response (CR)
How were Watson and Rayner able to condition Albert to react to different stimuli such as masks, other animals, and a fur coat? Explain the concept of generalization
Why didn't the conditioning last over time? Explain the concept of extinction

We do not do your homework for you. Although it might take more effort to do the work on your own, you will profit more from your effort. We will be happy to evaluate your work though.

However, I will give you a start.

UnconditionED stimulus = US = noise

ConditionED stimulus = rat

ConditionED response = crying/fear

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Watson+%22Conditioned+emotional+reactions%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Don't just copy the material. Express the ideas in your own words. Although this will take more time and effort, you will learn more.

In the article "Conditioned emotional reactions" by John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner, the initial pairing of the bar and the rat can be explained in terms of classical conditioning. Classical conditioning is a type of learning where a neutral stimulus, such as the rat, becomes associated with a meaningful stimulus, such as the bar, through repeated pairings.

In this study, the unconditional stimulus (US) is the bar, which naturally elicits fear in the participant, and the unconditional response (UR) is the fear response that is naturally triggered by the bar. The neutral stimulus, the rat, is initially unrelated to fear and does not naturally elicit any specific response.

The researchers paired the rat with the bar to create a conditioned stimulus (CS). Through repeated pairings, the rat became associated with the fear response triggered by the bar. Over time, the rat alone (CS) started to elicit a conditioned response (CR), which is the fear response that was originally triggered by the bar.

Watson and Rayner were able to condition Albert to react to different stimuli such as masks, other animals, and a fur coat by employing the concept of generalization. Generalization is the tendency for a conditioned response to occur in response to stimuli that are similar to the conditioned stimulus. In this study, Albert generalized his fear response from the rat to similar stimuli like masks, other animals, and the fur coat. This indicates that the fear response became associated with not just the rat but also other stimuli that shared similarities with the rat.

The conditioning did not last over time because of the process of extinction. Extinction occurs when the conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly presented without the unconditional stimulus (US), and as a result, the conditioned response (CR) weakens and eventually disappears. In the case of Albert, if the rat (CS) was repeatedly presented without the presentation of the bar (US), the fear response (CR) to the rat gradually diminished and eventually extinguished. This explains why the conditioning did not persist over time.

Overall, Watson and Rayner's study demonstrated the principles of classical conditioning, the concepts of unconditional stimulus (US), conditional stimulus (CS), and conditional response (CR), the process of generalization, and the process of extinction in the context of conditioning emotional reactions.