The First Cause argument for the existence of God assumes that
The First Cause argument for the existence of God assumes that (Points
http://www.existence-of-god.com/first-cause-argument.html
http://atheisthaven.blogspot.com/2009/05/arguing-for-existence-of-god-is-first.html
The First Cause argument, also known as the Cosmological Argument, is a philosophical and theological argument that seeks to prove the existence of God by positing that every event has a cause, and that there must be an initial, uncaused cause that started the chain of events in the universe. However, the argument is not without assumptions or premises.
One assumption that the First Cause argument makes is the principle of causality, which states that every effect has a cause. The argument takes this principle and applies it to the entire universe, asserting that since all things in the universe have causes, there must be an ultimate cause that started everything.
To explain how to approach this argument, you can start by acknowledging the premise of causality. The concept of causality is a fundamental principle that is often taken for granted in our everyday experiences. When analyzing the cause and effect relationship, it is important to recognize that causality is not an empirical observation, but rather a logical and conceptual assumption.
To further explore the First Cause argument, it is necessary to delve into the works of philosophers such as Aristotle or Thomas Aquinas, who have provided detailed explanations and formulations of this argument. By studying their writings, one can gain a clearer understanding of the assumptions made and the logical reasoning behind the First Cause argument.
It is vital to note that while the First Cause argument presents a logical framework for the existence of God, it is ultimately a philosophical argument and does not provide empirical evidence. Therefore, the acceptance or rejection of the First Cause argument depends on one's philosophical and theological perspectives.