If you consider The Call of the Wild to be an allegory, which one of the following statements would be true?
A. The book is a story about the need for socialism.
B. Judge Miller represents the primordial condition.
C. John Thornton represents the civilized world.
D. Buck represents some characteristic of humanity.
What do you think?
I'll be glad to check your answer.
I think it's
B. Judge Miller represents the primordial condition.
But, I also think it's D.
Help isn't urgent, I just would like a second opinion
I definitely prefer D.
Thanks Ms. Sue. You've been a great help!
You're welcome, Paul.
To determine which statement is true if we consider The Call of the Wild to be an allegory, we need to understand what an allegory is. An allegory is a narrative in which characters and events represent certain ideas or concepts, often with a hidden or symbolic meaning.
Now, let's analyze each option:
A. "The book is a story about the need for socialism."
To evaluate this statement, we would need to look for elements in the book that reflect socialist ideals or critique capitalism. This would involve examining the characters and events and their relation to socioeconomic systems. However, The Call of the Wild primarily focuses on the life of a dog named Buck and his journey in the wild, and it does not explicitly engage with socialist themes. Therefore, option A is unlikely to be true.
B. "Judge Miller represents the primordial condition."
To determine the validity of this statement, we would need to examine the character of Judge Miller and consider how he represents the primordial condition. However, in The Call of the Wild, Judge Miller is Buck's previous owner, a wealthy judge who lives in civilization. While he might represent certain aspects of domesticity and comfort, it is a stretch to conclude that he represents the primordial condition. Thus, option B is unlikely to be true.
C. "John Thornton represents the civilized world."
To assess the accuracy of this statement, we would need to explore the character of John Thornton and his portrayal in the book. John Thornton is depicted as an experienced outdoorsman who forms a deep bond with Buck and treats him with kindness, understanding, and respect. As such, although he exemplifies certain positive human characteristics, it is a leap to assert that he represents the entire civilized world. Therefore, option C is unlikely to be true.
D. "Buck represents some characteristic of humanity."
To evaluate this statement, we would need to analyze Buck's role and behavior in the story and determine if it aligns with some characteristic or aspect of humanity. Throughout the book, Buck's transformation from a domesticated dog to a wild and independent creature can be seen as a metaphor for the innate "call of the wild" that resides within all humans. Buck's struggle for survival, his adaptability, and the primal instincts he embodies serve as a reflection of certain aspects of human nature. Therefore, option D is the most plausible answer and likely to be true.
In conclusion, if we view The Call of the Wild as an allegory, the statement that would be true is: "D. Buck represents some characteristic of humanity."