Posted by PsyDAG on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 at 7:32pm.
Although prejudice is often defined as a negative attitude, we all have prejudices (biases) toward almost everything we consider. Differences occur in terms of how extreme our bias is and how much it influences our actions - including our language. If we are aware of our biases, we can often minimize them.
I will give you some sources dealing with influencing others, but, since rhetorical devices are not in my area of expertise, I will leave it to you to relate the material to them.
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceAntecedents.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceMorePrinciples.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/InfluenceStillMore.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/MeanNewsMedia.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/Persuasion.html
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/QuestionFrame.html
how can readers distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices?
To distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices, readers can consider the following steps:
1. Understand the purpose of the rhetorical device: Rhetorical devices can be used to enhance communication, persuade others, or manipulate opinions. It is important to assess whether the purpose aligns with fairness, logic, and the search for truth, or if it aims to promote bias or prejudice.
2. Examine the content and tone: Analyze the language and tone used in the rhetoric. Prejudicial use often involves stereotypes, generalizations, or derogatory language that targets specific groups of people. Non-prejudicial use focuses on presenting logical arguments, providing evidence, and promoting respectful communication.
3. Look for fairness and balance: Prejudicial rhetoric tends to present a one-sided view, deliberately omitting information or perspectives that challenge the speaker's bias. Non-prejudicial rhetoric usually includes balanced viewpoints, acknowledges alternative perspectives, and respects diversity.
4. Consider the impact and consequences: Assess the potential effects of the rhetorical device. Prejudicial use can perpetuate stereotypes, fuel discrimination, or marginalize certain groups. Non-prejudicial rhetoric, on the other hand, aims to foster understanding, encourage critical thinking, and promote inclusivity.
5. Evaluate the credibility of the source: Take into account the credibility and intentions of the speaker or author using the rhetorical device. Prejudicial rhetoric often comes from sources with a known bias or agenda, whereas non-prejudicial rhetoric is more likely to come from reliable and objective sources.
By following these steps, readers can critically evaluate the use of rhetorical devices and distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial approaches. It is also important to remain open-minded, consider different perspectives, and be willing to challenge one's own biases.