Which one of the following statements about lying is true.

To determine which statement about lying is true, we can evaluate each of the statements and verify their accuracy. Here are the statements you provided:

1. "Lying is always morally wrong."
2. "White lies are harmless and acceptable."
3. "Lying is never justified under any circumstance."

To determine which one is true, let's analyze each statement individually:

1. "Lying is always morally wrong." This statement is an ethical perspective that considers lying as universally immoral. However, moral beliefs vary among individuals, cultures, and ethical frameworks. Some people might argue that lying is justified in certain situations such as to protect someone from harm. To validate this statement, you can examine different ethical theories, like deontology or consequentialism, which offer different perspectives on lying's morality.

2. "White lies are harmless and acceptable." A white lie refers to a harmless or trivial lie told to avoid hurting someone's feelings or to maintain harmony. Whether or not white lies are acceptable depends on personal values and cultural norms. Some people argue that white lies can be a compassionate way to navigate social situations, while others believe that honesty is always preferable. To assess the validity of this statement, you can explore different perspectives on honesty and assess the potential consequences of white lies.

3. "Lying is never justified under any circumstance." This statement takes an absolutist stance, claiming that lying is never justified, regardless of the situation. However, there are instances where lying could be seen as justifiable, such as during emergencies or to protect someone from harm. Evaluating this statement involves examining various scenarios and ethical frameworks to determine whether lying can be ethically and morally justified in certain circumstances.

Ultimately, the question of which statement is true about lying involves a philosophical and ethical discussion. It requires considering different perspectives, ethical theories, and individual values to arrive at a personal conclusion.