Argue for or against which source (traditional library sources versus web-based research sources) would be better to prepare for a debate on changing the state's laws on smoking in public buildings.
Which side do you want to take?
Since this is not my area of expertise, I searched Google under the key words "library vs. web-based research" to get these possible sources:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=library+vs.+web-based+research&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
You can add "laws on smoking" to the above key words.
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.
To argue for or against the use of traditional library sources versus web-based research sources for preparing a debate on changing the state's laws on smoking in public buildings, let's consider the following points.
For traditional library sources:
1. Credibility: Traditional library sources, such as books, scholarly journals, and research papers, are often peer-reviewed and have undergone a rigorous quality control process. This ensures a higher level of credibility compared to web-based sources, where anyone can publish information.
2. Depth and breadth of information: Libraries contain a vast collection of resources, providing comprehensive and in-depth information on various subjects. These resources often cover historical perspectives, legal precedents, and expert analyses, which can greatly enhance the argument in a debate.
3. Expert guidance: Libraries also have librarians who can assist in locating relevant resources and provide guidance on how to effectively search for information. They possess knowledge and expertise in navigating the vast array of available resources to find accurate and reliable information.
For web-based research sources:
1. Accessibility and timeliness: Web-based research sources offer convenience and quick access to a wide range of information. Online platforms provide opportunities to access the most recent studies, news articles, and government reports, which can be vital when discussing current smoking laws and their impact.
2. Diverse perspectives: The internet provides access to a multitude of resources, including personal testimonies, blogs, and opinion pieces. This allows for a broader range of perspectives on smoking in public buildings and can enrich the debate with real-life experiences and opinions.
3. Multimedia resources: Web-based research sources often include multimedia elements, such as videos, images, and interactive tools, which can enhance the understanding and engagement with the topic. These resources can make the debate more dynamic and compelling.
The choice between traditional library sources and web-based research sources ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the debate and the availability of resources. A balanced approach, combining both sources, is often the most effective way to gather comprehensive and reliable information to support arguments in a debate. It is important to critically evaluate the credibility, relevance, and timeliness of the information obtained from any source, regardless of its medium.