Identify two different types of businesses or corporations (be as specific as possible) that receive subsidies, through which it could be argued that environmental damage is a result. Briefly describe the environmental damage for each.
http://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#hl=en&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=subsidy+environmental+damage&oq=subsidy+environmental+damage&gs_l=serp.3..0i30j0i5i30.6157.6157.3.7031.1.1.0.0.0.0.85.85.1.1.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.8Mpp_TNhhOA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=c4a6a840dc754efa&biw=711&bih=453
To identify two different types of businesses or corporations that receive subsidies and could be argued to cause environmental damage, we need to consider industries that have a significant impact on the environment and are supported by government subsidies. Here are two examples:
1. Fossil Fuel Industry: One of the most commonly discussed industries in this context is the fossil fuel industry, specifically companies involved in oil, coal, and gas extraction. Governments often provide subsidies to these companies in various forms, such as tax breaks, direct funding, or reduced regulatory oversight. The environmental damage caused by this industry includes air pollution from burning fossil fuels, greenhouse gas emissions contributing to climate change, destruction of natural habitats through extraction methods like mountaintop removal mining, and oil spills that harm ocean ecosystems.
2. Industrial Agriculture: Another industry that receives significant subsidies is industrial agriculture, where large-scale farming operations produce crops and livestock for mass consumption. Subsidies in the form of price support, crop insurance, and research funding are provided to support this sector. However, industrial agriculture has been associated with several environmental problems. For instance, the excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides can lead to water pollution, as these chemicals run off into rivers and lakes, disrupting aquatic ecosystems. The clearing of land for large-scale agriculture also contributes to deforestation, habitat loss, and loss of biodiversity.
It is important to note that the argument about whether these subsidies directly cause environmental damage is a complex and debated issue. Some argue that subsidies can promote technological advancements and transition towards cleaner practices, while others believe that subsidies perpetuate unsustainable industries.