"All Conflict in its simplest form its struggle between good and evil.
I need a good interpretation. I cant use good and evil in the interprestation. There needs to be another word for good and evil. I don't know how to interpret without good and evil.
Try these and see what you think:
Instead of "good" say "what's considered right" in the particular society.
Instead of "evel" say "what's considered wrong" in the particular society.
In every story there is always someone that represents the wrong traits and the right traits of a person. Right vs wrong.
how is that interpretation above
... that represents what's right and what's wrong in that culture. (... in that society)
so how should i explain this
http://www.google.com/search?q=All+Conflict+in+its+simplest+form+its+struggle+between+good+and+evil.&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS379US379&oq=All+Conflict+in+its+simplest+form+its+struggle+between+good+and+evil.&aqs=chrome.0.57j62.4517&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Read many of these and see what you come up with.
When interpreting conflict in a way that doesn't involve using the terms "good" and "evil," it can be helpful to consider conflict as a clash between opposing forces or opposing principles. Instead of assigning a moral judgment to these forces or principles, you can focus on the differing perspectives, motivations, or values that drive individuals or groups into conflict.
One possible alternative interpretation of conflict could be a struggle between right and wrong. "Right" refers to actions or ideas that align with what is considered just, fair, or morally upright, while "wrong" represents actions or ideas that deviate from these principles. By reframing the terms as "right" and "wrong," you can avoid explicitly using "good" and "evil" while still acknowledging the contrasting values at play.
Another way to interpret conflict without relying on the notions of "good" and "evil" is by considering it as a clash between opposing interests. Each party involved in the conflict might have different goals, desires, or needs, resulting in a struggle to protect or fulfill those interests. This interpretation focuses on the clash of self-interest and the competition for resources, power, or influence rather than making moral judgments about the parties involved.
In summary, when seeking an interpretation of conflict without using "good" and "evil," you can focus on alternative terms like right and wrong, or frame the conflict as a clash between opposing interests or principles. By shifting the focus away from moral judgments, you can analyze the various perspectives, motivations, and values that drive conflicts without relying on the binary notion of good and evil.