Sela is a securely attached baby. Sela, therefore, is likely to successfully resolve the crisis of basic trust versus basic mistrust. India is insecurely attached, and is less likely to resolve the trust versus mistrust crisis successfully. In the long term:
whether or not children are securely attached in infancy will not matter. It is most likely that both children will end up about the same.
Sela will probably be more competent, resilient, confident, and curious, and India will be better able to resolve conflicts, interact positively with teachers, and get higher grades.
secure attachment in infancy will result in Sela becoming overly attached to her mother, so she will be more timid in adulthood. India, on the other hand, will learn to fend for herself, so she will be better adjusted in the long run.
Sela will feel more secure about herself, probably be better at making friends, and is more likely to do well in school. India is more likely to have such problems as inhibitions, dependency, and lower grades in school.
Please help, I have no idea
What is your question?
Based on the information provided, it seems that securely attached babies like Sela are more likely to successfully resolve the trust versus mistrust crisis compared to insecurely attached babies like India. However, you are asking about the long-term effects of attachment styles, and the options given in your question present different perspectives on this.
1. Option 1 suggests that whether or not children are securely attached in infancy will not matter in the long run and both Sela and India will end up about the same. This suggests that attachment style has no significant impact on their future outcomes.
2. Option 2 suggests that Sela, as a securely attached baby, is more likely to develop characteristics such as competence, resilience, confidence, and curiosity. Meanwhile, India, as an insecurely attached baby, may struggle with resolving conflicts, interacting positively with teachers, and achieving higher grades. This perspective highlights the potential positive influence of secure attachment on various aspects of a child's development.
3. Option 3 proposes that secure attachment in infancy may result in Sela becoming overly attached to her mother, leading to timidity in adulthood. In contrast, India, as an insecurely attached baby, may learn to be more independent and better adjusted in the long run. This perspective suggests a possible negative outcome for Sela and a positive one for India.
4. Option 4 states that Sela, as a securely attached baby, is likely to feel more secure about herself, have better social skills in making friends, and perform well in school. On the other hand, India, as an insecurely attached baby, may experience problems such as inhibitions, dependency, and lower grades in school. This perspective emphasizes the potential positive impact of secure attachment on self-esteem, social skills, and academic performance.
It is important to note that attachment styles in infancy do influence children's development, but individual experiences, environments, and other factors also contribute to their long-term outcomes. It is not possible to definitively determine which option is correct based solely on the information provided, as each perspective presents a different viewpoint on the potential effects of attachment styles.