Word bank acquit deem devastate discredit elusive generate idolize ingratitude keepsake mortal ovation petty plight repent reverie revocation scan strand strife topple
Since I sincerely appreciate all my parents have done for me how can you accuse me of ___
deem?
Because the members of my family disagree on so many matters the dinner table is often the scene of much verbal ___
strife?
The evidence against the accused man proved to be so weak that the jury had no choice but to ___ him
acquit?
No.
Please check the definitions of these words.
The first one is wrong. The other two are right.
I don't have the time to read every word of that long newspaper article but Ill ___ it quickly to get the main idea
scan?
Since it is clear that his only interest is to make money for himself his plan for building a new highway has been completely ____
generate?
The wound at first did not appear to be too serious but to our great grief it proved to be ___
mortal?
1 and 3 are right. 2 is not.
Generate is wrong? So on Since I sincerely appreciate all my parents have done for me how can you accuse me of ___
Is it generate and on 2 is it deem
One of the answers is discredited; the other is ingratitude.
2 is ingratitude and the other one is discredit?
I'm not sure which sentences you mean. Please copy and paste the sentences here along with your word.
Since I sincerely appreciate all my parents have done for me how can you accuse me of ___
discredit?
Since it is clear that his only interest is to make money for himself his plan for building a new highway has been completely __-
ingratitude?
To answer your first question, you may accuse someone of "deem" when you believe they are not appreciative or grateful for something. In this case, you can accuse someone of lacking the proper appreciation for what their parents have done.
For your second question, you can use the word "strife" to describe the disagreements and conflicts that occur within your family at the dinner table.
Lastly, the word "acquit" can be used when the evidence against an accused person is weak, leading the jury to rule that the person is not guilty. The jury, in this case, had no other option but to acquit the accused man because the evidence against him was inadequate.