After a laparoscopic procedure was unsuccessful.
A) complete sentence
B) fragment
C) run-on
Sounds like a fragment, explains very little that would be my best answer.
I think your right. :)
Right. That is a dependent clause. There is no independent clause.
To determine if the given statement is a complete sentence, a fragment, or a run-on, we need to understand the characteristics of each option.
A complete sentence typically consists of a subject, a verb, and expresses a complete thought. It can stand alone and make sense on its own.
A fragment, on the other hand, is an incomplete sentence that lacks the necessary components to form a complete thought. It may be missing a subject, a verb, or both.
A run-on sentence occurs when two or more independent clauses are improperly joined together without appropriate punctuation or conjunctions.
Now, let's analyze the given statement: "After a laparoscopic procedure was unsuccessful."
This statement lacks a subject, as there is no specified person or thing performing the action. Therefore, it is a fragment.
To revise it into a complete sentence, we could add a subject and a verb. For example: "The laparoscopic procedure was unsuccessful."
In summary, the given statement "After a laparoscopic procedure was unsuccessful" is a fragment because it lacks a subject and verb to form a complete thought.