Science, Astrenomey

This is my theory, read well if you wish to know the truth: according to the big bang, there is a equal amount of anti-matter to the matter, BUT nearly all that matter is missing! In this theory there was NO anti-matter when the earth was made. anti-matter is made when something goes into a black hole, then comes out a white hole as anti matter. BUT you cant see a black Hole because, light comes from the sun and reflects off your eyes, then it bounces off something else and then it comes back to your eyes. if light cannot escape a black hole then how can you see it? you cant see nothing, can you? perhaps your brain thinks its a extra blind spot and the sub conscious mind fills up the space where it sees nothing. if black holes done exist then i have another way anti-matter was formed; when something is burned it loses weight in ash, for example: get a big log, then burn it. the size and density of the ashes left is less, less heavy, less matter. where did the matter go? it MUST have turned into anti matter! if you need to correct me or prove me wrong then, go ahead, i want to see if i'm right! am i right?

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 420
  1. typical web rant; poorly typed, vacuous and content-free.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  2. huh? i just wanted to get my theory up fast and i normally text. i an not ranting, also i'm a creationist! are you my negative uncle?

  3. that's a negative. :-)

    Before pursuing a theory, do a little research.

    For example, when the log is burnt, the ashes have less mass, but you also need to include the gases created by the combustion, as well as the fine particles that blow away, and the energy produced by the chemical reactions.

    Your ideas are creative, but before you extend the frontiers of human knowledge, it would help to explore what is already known.

    Also, no physicist proposes that there was NO anti-matter when the earth was created. There was plenty of it, as there is some around even now. Just not much in our neighborhood of space.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  4. I still don't agree with the big bang...

  5. That's OK. Lots of people don't, including many physicists. It's just an attempt to explain observed phenomena.

    Hang in there. You may one day propose a better theory. However, just like all of science, it will only be a theory. The more observable phenomena it explains, the better it is, but there will not ever be a way to prove it.

    All of the "laws" of science we now accept are just theories which explain how to predict results. No one really knows what electrons "are" or how gravity works. There are fancy equations that describe the state of things as we see them, but they don't really explain anything.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  6. i realley thought i had something... i better do some research on wiki's and encyclopedias. i disagree with those physicists guys. perhaps ill be one of those guys who argue and argue with the people who THINK they know things. who knows, i may be half-right.

  7. right you are, science is a theory.

  8. Just one more thing. Being a creationist does not mean you have to reject scientific theories. Even if God did create the universe, he had to use physical laws to do it. Maybe God is in control of those laws, and maybe not. If he is, he's done a pretty good job of making things work out.

    It's also possible that God has to obey the same laws of physics we do. Maybe not, or maybe he knows a larger collection of laws than we do. In fact, that would almost be a given. For sure he would have a deeper understanding of those laws than we do.

    Just because God said "Let there be light!" doesn't mean that it just happened. He used his knowledge of physics to cause it.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  9. Thanks so much! maybe God created the world THEN made gravity and physics for his new creation? ill never know until i go to heaven. you sound exactly like Tristen, my friend. are you him with a internet name Steve?

  10. sorry - that's another negative.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. Science

    Which of the following best describes a scientific theory? A.A scientific theory is a rule of nature that can never be changed. B.A scientific theory is an educatrd guess about the possible results of an experiment. C.A scientific

    asked by Beau on August 28, 2014
  2. criminology

    If a treatment program focused on providing models of positive behavior, rewarding positive behavior, and providing consequences for aggressive behavior, which theories would the program be based on? (Select all that apply.)

    asked by Bri on April 20, 2018
  3. science

    Which of the following best describes a theory? A a theory is a guess or hunch about something that has occurred in nature B a theory is based on verifiable laws that can be proven true C a theory is a set of ideas that explains a

    asked by moshimonsterssssss on September 24, 2018
  4. finance (structure of interest rates)

    Some analysts believe that the term structure of interest reates is determined by the behavior of various types of financial institutions. this theory is called the: A. expectations hypothesis B. segmentation theory C. liquidity

    asked by Jason on July 25, 2008
  5. Chemistry

    Can you provide me with some, at least two, examples each of the Limitations of the following chemical bondings; ionic bonding theory, coordinate bonding theory, covalent bonding theory and metallic bonding theory.

    asked by Elie on August 8, 2012
  1. psy - revise

    match -Psychodynamic Theory -Trait Theory -Learning Theory -Humanistic Theory -Sociocultural g. Social and cultural factors such as ethnicity, gender, culture, discrimination, and socioeconomic status influence one's sense of self

    asked by rose - Ms. Sue on April 20, 2008
  2. English 10th grade

    This is confusing to me: "Truth, Sekhar reflected, is like the sun. I suppose no human being can ever look it straight in the face without blinking or being dazed. He realized that, morning till night, the essence of human

    asked by Sandra on March 24, 2014
  3. help with my science test 7th grade connection

    4.How is a scientific theory different from a hypothesis A.A theory is an explanation of a single phenomenon ;a hypothesis is a question that can be tested B.A theory is a well tested explanation ; a hypothesis is a possible

    asked by Angle on September 15, 2017
  4. American Government

    1. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were European philosophers who influenced American founding documents with which theory? A. social contract theory B. divine right of kings theory C. no taxation without representation theory D.

    asked by Jessica on September 19, 2016
  5. Bio

    1. A control group differs from an experimental group: A. in the number of test organisms used. B. by the independent variable. C. in several ways. D. in no way. is it A 2. A theory and a hypothesis are different in that: A. you

    asked by Amy on July 10, 2013
  6. psy - revised

    match -Psychodynamic Theory -Trait Theory -Learning Theory -Humanistic Theory -Sociocultural B. Popular theorist Eysenck initiated the five-factor model. Ans: Trait theory e. Popular theorists include Maslow and Rogers. Ans:

    asked by rose - Ms. Sue on April 20, 2008

You can view more similar questions or ask a new question.