By the start of World War I, America had emerged as a global power. A large part of this power had to do with American expansion overseas. What territories did America acquire during the late 19th and early 20th centuries? What competing arguments exist regarding this period of territorial expansion? With which interpretation do you agree, and why?
Can someone please help
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_territorial_acquisitions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_imperialism
During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, America acquired several territories through its expansion overseas. Here are some key territories:
1. Alaska: In 1867, the United States purchased Alaska from Russia, expanding its territory westward.
2. Hawaii: In 1898, the U.S. annexed Hawaii, which had been a sovereign kingdom, after a coup by American sugar planters.
3. Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines: After the Spanish-American War in 1898, Spain ceded these territories to the United States.
4. American Samoa: The U.S. established control over American Samoa through a series of treaties starting in 1878 and culminating in 1900.
Regarding the competing arguments surrounding this period of territorial expansion, there are two main interpretations:
1. Imperialism and Expansionism: Critics argue that American territorial expansion was driven by a desire for economic resources, military bases, and geopolitical influence. They view these actions as a form of imperialism, resulting in the exploitation of other nations and undermining their sovereignty.
2. Manifest Destiny and Security: Supporters argue that America's expansion was justified by the belief in Manifest Destiny, the idea that it was the nation's destiny to expand its territory. They argue that acquiring these territories provided economic opportunities and increased national security.
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, it is important to note that there is ongoing debate among historians about the motivations and effects of American territorial expansion. The interpretation with which one agrees may depend on their perspective and values. Some may view it as necessary for America's growth and security, while others may see it as a manifestation of imperialistic policies.