2. The 1978 Supreme Court decision in Bakke v. Regents of the University of California
A. established the rights of students to appeal college admissions policies.
B. established the "red state-blue state" divide.
C. ruled in favor of affirmative action within specified limits.
D. ruled against the principle of affirmative action.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1323740841
IS THE ANWSER C?
The answer to this question is C. The 1978 Supreme Court decision in Bakke v. Regents of the University of California ruled in favor of affirmative action within specified limits.
To arrive at this answer, you could start by researching the case of Bakke v. Regents of the University of California. This landmark Supreme Court case involved a white applicant named Allan Bakke who had been denied admission to the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, while minority applicants with lower GPAs and test scores were accepted. Bakke argued that he was a victim of reverse discrimination and challenged the use of racial quotas in college admissions.
Next, you could look into the Supreme Court's decision and its implications. The Court's ruling in this case was complex, as it consisted of a plurality opinion without a clear majority consensus. However, the Court did vote to strike down the specific racial quotas used by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine. They found that such quotas violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
However, the Court also recognized the importance of diversity in college admissions and allowed for the consideration of race as a factor in a holistic admissions process. They upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action, but with certain restrictions and limitations. The Court stated that race could be one factor among many considered in admissions decisions, as long as it was not the sole or predominant factor.
Based on this information, you can conclude that the 1978 Supreme Court decision in Bakke v. Regents of the University of California ruled in favor of affirmative action within specified limits, making option C the correct answer.