Is appeasement necessarily, as it was applied to Nazi Germany in the 1930's, considered to be against the topics discussed in the quotations below? Explain

The human person realizes dignity and rights in relationship with others, in community. "If one member suffers, all suffer together with it: if one member is honoured, all rejoice together with it." (1 Corinthians 12: 26) We are called to respect each other and work for the good of others, the common good.
“In keeping with the social nature of man, the good of each individual is necessarily related to the common good, which in turn can be defined only in reference to the human person. Do not live entirely isolated, having retreated into yourselves, as if you were already justified, but gather instead to seek the common good together.” Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 1905

Please note that no one here will do your work for you. However, we will be happy to read over what YOU THINK and make suggestions and/or corrections.


Please post what you think.

To determine if appeasement, specifically as applied to Nazi Germany in the 1930s, aligns with the quotations provided, we need to analyze the principles and values expressed in the quotes.

The first quotation from 1 Corinthians 12:26 emphasizes the interconnectedness of individuals within a community. It states that if one member suffers, all members suffer together, and if one member is honored, all rejoice together. This quotation promotes solidarity, empathy, and collective responsibility for the well-being of others.

The second quotation from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 1905, highlights the social nature of humankind and the importance of pursuing the common good. It emphasizes that individual well-being is intimately linked to the well-being of the community. It encourages people to come together in pursuit of the common good, rather than living in isolation or self-centeredness.

Applying these principles to the concept of appeasement as it was used with Nazi Germany, we can argue that it may be seen as conflicting with the quotations. Appeasement refers to the policy of making concessions and compromises to avoid conflict or aggression from a hostile party. In the case of Nazi Germany, many argue that the policy of appeasement, pursued by Western democracies, allowed Adolf Hitler to expand his power and initiate World War II.

From the perspective of the quotations, appeasement may be seen as falling short in terms of both pursuing the common good and demonstrating solidarity with those who were suffering under Nazi Germany's oppressive regime. By not taking a more assertive stance against Hitler's aggression, the Western democracies potentially neglected their responsibility to protect the well-being of others and promote the collective good.

However, it is important to note that the decision to pursue appeasement during this period was influenced by various factors, including political calculations, fears of another devastating war, and a desire to avoid conflict at all costs. Different arguments can be made for or against appeasement, and it is ultimately a complex historical and moral question.